Prop 32: If at First You Don’t Succeed Try, Try Again

By EGP Editorial

Election season is upon us. There are just six weeks left to discuss not only the presidential election but also an usually large number of state propositions on the ballot.

Among the propositions voters will have to decide on in November is one that deals with an issue that its backers have unsuccessfully tried to gain support for in other ways, and have taken the stance that if at first you don’t succeed try, try again.

We are referring to Proposition 32: Political Contributions by Payroll Deduction. Contributions to Candidates; also referred to at times as the paycheck protection proposition.

Prop 32 backers say the initiative will protect workers from their unions taking money out of their paychecks and using it to lobby for candidates and measures they might not agree without their permission. The measure is supposed to prevent the same practice by corporations or government bodies, but the measure is not really about the money coming from businesses, it’s about stopping a primary source of money going to unions that is used for political purposes.

The independent Legislative Analysts says “A YES vote on this measure means: Unions and corporations could not use money deducted from an employee’s paycheck for political purposes.”

What Prop 32 does not do is take money out of politics. It does not limit the influence of business Super Pacs; it also exempts thousands of businesses.

But truth be told, businesses are not the only ones exerting powerful influence through money these days, so do some of the larger unions. Some call that a leveling of the playing field between the individual worker and large corporations. Others say it is imposing the will of the union on its members.

If passed, Prop 32 will demand that a union get yearly approval from non-union members to spend their dues on political activities.
Some union workers might see that as a good thing, but others see it as a weakening of the bodies that are supposed to represent them.
This is not the first time the issue has been on the ballot, past efforts have been defeated by a strong well-funded labor unions that get their members to the polls to vote.

This year, more than ever in the past, the role and influence of labor unions has come under scrutiny and fire. So has the role of corporations.

Voters will have to decide the issue again in November. This time around, we make no recommendation.

Print This Post Print This Post

September 27, 2012  Copyright © 2012 Eastern Group Publications, Inc.

Comments

2 Responses to “Prop 32: If at First You Don’t Succeed Try, Try Again”

  1. Jose U on September 27th, 2012 11:19 pm

    Wow so you have no recommendation on a corporate take over? When have you heard of a Corporation using employee paycheck deductions for political purposes? We do need campaign reform but prop 32 is totally biased and one sided.
    “This year, more than ever in the past, the role and influence of labor unions has come under scrutiny and fire. So has the role of corporations.”
    Biggest load of crap I have ever read. Vote No on Prop 32

  2. Jane Lea on September 28th, 2012 5:26 pm

    Give me one other organization that fights for worker’s rights.

    If this was to hurt the big corporate interest why are they the ones putting money into this campaign to pass? The Koch bros., Carl Rove, big oil companies, and insurance companies, wall street bankers and developers. That’s because they are all exempt from Prop 32.

    Labor rights aren’t etched in stone. They were won through politics and collective bargaining. So if you’re the 99% that have to work for a living say, “good bye” to, vacation leave, health insurance, 8 hour work day, minimum wage, work place health and safety laws, overtime pay, unemployment, child labor laws, meal breaks, nurse patient ratios just to name a few. Screw 32 vote NO

Comments are intended to further discussion on the article topic. EGPNews reserves the right to not publish, edit or remove comments that contain vulgarities, foul language, personal attacks, racists, sexist, homophobic or other offensive terminology or that contain solicitations, spam, or that threaten harm of any sort. EGPNews will not approve comments that call for or applaud the death, injury or illness of any person, regardless of their public status. Questions regarding this policy should be e-mailed to service@egpnews.com.





 characters available

Copyright © 2014 Eastern Group Publications, Inc. · Log in