Northeast LA Residents Debate Merits of Bike Lanes

By Gloria Angelina Castillo, EGP Staff Writer

The Historic Highland Park Neighborhood Council is scheduled to hear a presentation tonight by the Department of Transportation on proposed bike lanes in Northeast Los Angeles.

The bike lanes are part of the city’s 2010 Bicycle Plan that aims to promote cycling, improve the health of Angelenos and make streets safer for cyclists across the city.

The neighborhood council is in the process of deciding whether it will support or oppose the bike lanes, which would replace vehicle lanes on Colorado Boulevard in Eagle Rock and Highland Park, HHPNC member Teri Bonsell told EGP.

Before they decide, however, the council wants to know more about where the stakeholders they represent stand on the proposal.

At a March 27 public meeting on the proposal, an overwhelming majority of the 100 or so attendees who identified themselves as Northeast LA residents, said putting in the bike lanes is a good idea.

Ninety-two comment cards were submitted, and 73 percent supported the bike lanes while only 27 were opposed, Councilman Jose Huizar’s spokesman Rick Coca told EGP about the town hall meeting at Occidental College.

Thirty-one people spoke in favor of the plan, and only 8 were opposed, he added.

“If this were an election, this would have been a landslide,” Coca said.

The Colorado Boulevard Bike Lane plan calls for taking one of the three lanes in each direction of Colorado Boulevard in Eagle Rock, now dedicated to vehicles, and converting to them to bicycle lanes, he told EGP. That would still leave two lanes in each direction for cars, Coca said.

While some Highland Park residents have expressed concern that the change could impact traffic on York Boulevard, Coca says those fears are unfounded, noting that there are already bike lanes on York. He added that North Figueroa Street will not be affected by the changes on Colorado, but did say that Figueroa is a candidate for bike lanes.

AB 2245, passed by state lawmakers, exempts bike lane proposals from having to go through the exhaustive environmental studies required for many other types of planning and transportation projects, according to Coca.

Late last month, Metro launched an advertising campaign to inform the public that cyclists have the same rights as vehicles on the streets, and to remind them that cyclists sometimes need to ride in the middle of a lane to navigate safely. Adding designated bike lanes will make cycling safer, according to the city’s bicycle plan.

Responding this week to inquiries from EGP, both the Highland Park Chamber of Commerce and the Eagle Rock Chamber of Commerce said they have not yet taken a formal stand on the bike lanes, which if installed could affect vehicle traffic in commercial areas, but both groups are considering taking a stand.

Businesses along Colorado could be impacted by traffic, Eagle Rock Chamber President Michael Noguera told EGP.

Many of the chamber’s members are concerned that replacing a lane for cars in each direction for one for bicycles will cause major traffic delays, especially when the State Route 2-Glendale and State Route 134-Ventura freeways are backed up, Noguera said.

“Put yellow cones up… do a survey, see how many bicycles do travel down Colorado,” said Noguera, explaining he would prefer a temporary pilot program to study the impact on traffic and to see if there really is a need for the bike lanes.

Noguera said he personally doesn’t feel many cyclists use Colorado, since there is no destination, like a beach or the zoo, at either end of Colorado. Putting in the lanes will just cause traffic to be bumper to bumper, he said.

The department of transportation, however, says the bicycle lanes are not just to accommodate people already riding bikes to get around, but also to make cycling a more attractive alternative form of transportation in the city.

While proponents of the bike lane conversion greatly out numbered their opposition at last week’s meeting, local cyclists were nonetheless taken aback by the protests. Flying Pigeon LA, a bike shop located on York Boulevard, captured anti-cyclist signs at the meeting on video and blamed some local media outlets for stirring up local residents.

A flyer delivered to area residents, quotes one local monthly puclication as saying: “Bike extremists to rule the roads” and “commuters will be gridlocked daily.”

“If we stay home and let the bike lane haters have their way, our streets can stay scary and dangerous car-only places. If we mobilize, our streets can also become safer, more livable, and better for local walk-up business foot traffic,” Flying Pigeon owner Josef Bray-Ali wrote on his blog, encouraging cyclists to attend today’s meeting.

The neighborhood council meeting is open to the public and residents interested in listening to the Dept. of Transportation presentation are invited to attend, Bosnell said. The meeting begins at 7 p.m. at the Highland Park Senior Center, located at 6152 N Figueroa St., Los Angeles, 90042.

Read the 2010 Bicycle Plan at http://clkrep.lacity.org/onlinedocs/2010/10-2385-S2_MISC_07-11-2011.pdf

Print This Post Print This Post

April 4, 2013  Copyright © 2012 Eastern Group Publications, Inc.

Comments

2 Responses to “Northeast LA Residents Debate Merits of Bike Lanes”

  1. Today’s Headlines | Streetsblog Los Angeles on April 5th, 2013 9:50 am

    [...] Huizar, Public Speakers Overwhelmingly Support NELA Bike Lanes (EGP News) [...]

  2. James Donohue on April 5th, 2013 6:32 pm

    The roads are wide enough for cars to pass , seven to ten feet to the left of my bicycle. 99% of drivers pass safely.
    We have new inventions; good rear0view mirrors appeared in 1994, LED tail lights for bicycles last a long time on a set of batteries. We didn’t have helmets available when we were kids, we asked, and begged, for football helmets, but everyone was against the idea… Seems pretty stupid that the people who say “you gotta wear a helmet” were *against* the idea of helmets , forty years ago. But I digress.
    We have, or at least the more affluent amongst s have, Digital Cameras. I ride with a Digital Camera mounted on my Bike’s handlebars. Now I have seen trenches being dug at a local intersection, and when I inquired what they were for, I was told that cameras are being installed on ALL Traffic Lights.
    Somebody had to be a Jerk, and blew his horn incessantly at some kid on a bicycle, and had to *pretend* that there was only two inches of room available to pass the kid-on-a-bike. There was twelve feet available, to pass the bike, but the driver was , let us say , “stingy” , and didn’t want to share. So please don’t complain about the cameras, and don’t tell me we’re living in a police state, and “big brother is watching” . There are Jerks on the road, whose egos are bigger than their SUV’s, and they need to be caught. There’s no need to pass so close to a kid-on-a-bike. In fact, the motorist may be a child-molester, you ought to consider.
    _ and give the bicyclers more room, it’s to the left of your car, in the fourteen feet of asphalt between your car door and the double yellow line.

Comments are intended to further discussion on the article topic. EGPNews reserves the right to not publish, edit or remove comments that contain vulgarities, foul language, personal attacks, racists, sexist, homophobic or other offensive terminology or that contain solicitations, spam, or that threaten harm of any sort. EGPNews will not approve comments that call for or applaud the death, injury or illness of any person, regardless of their public status. Questions regarding this policy should be e-mailed to service@egpnews.com.





 characters available

Copyright © 2014 Eastern Group Publications, Inc. · Log in