City Probe Clears Huizar: Godoy Lawsuit Continues

By City News Service

A panel hired by the city to investigate sexual harassment and retaliation claims made against Councilman Jose Huizar by a former aide concluded there was no evidence of wrongdoing by Huizar.

The concluding section of the report, which was obtained last Friday by City News Service, evaluates the 18 allegations made by Francine Godoy against Huizar in a complaint filed with the state Department of Fair Employment and Housing, including discrimination, harassment, retaliation and denial of employment. In each case, the probe “did not reveal any evidence” to support the claims, according to the panel.

Regarding Godoy’s claim of a hostile work environment in the 14th Council District, the panel found that “to the contrary of the allegation, many CD-14 staff members expressed that Ms. Godoy created a hostile work environment, by targeting others with criticism and profanity.”

The report, prepared by Batza and Associates in conjunction with a Special Committee on Investigative Oversight appointed by Council President Herb Wesson, notes that Godoy refused to cooperate in the investigation, so the probe “was as thorough as possible given the circumstances.”

Godoy sued Huizar and the city last year, alleging — among other things—that her former boss offered to support her in an election campaign in exchange for sex. She claimed she declined to provide sexual favors, leading to a pattern of discrimination and retaliation that included Huizar withdrawing his support for Godoy’s bid for a seat on the Los Angeles Community College District Board of Trustees.

Huizar has denied any wrongdoing, although the married councilman admitted last October that he and Godoy had a “consensual” relationship that he “deeply regrets.”

Godoy’s attorney, Michael Eisenberg, could not be reached for immediate comment on the city’s investigative report. In the past, he has been critical of the city’s investigation, noting that Wesson—who ordered the probe—headlined a political fundraiser for Huizar last October, calling Huizar his “best friend on the council.”

Eisenberg filed court papers last year calling the city investigation an attempt to obtain information that could be used against Godoy in her lawsuit.

Robert Alaniz, a spokesman for Huizar’s law firm, Walsh & Associates, hailed the report’s findings.

“We are very pleased that after a thorough and exhaustive review with numerous and comprehensive interviews, this distinguished panel of legal professionals has concluded that Ms. Godoy’s allegations are baseless,” Alaniz told City News Service.

“We have maintained all along that Ms. Godoy’s claims are false and malicious and that her claims are motivated by greed and a desire to destroy the councilman’s reputation because he would not help advance her career as she demanded,” he said.

The City Council voted 10-0 today to cover Huizar’s legal fees defending against the lawsuit, agreeing to pay Walsh & Associates up to $200,000.

Council members have received copies of the investigative report, but it was not reviewed by the council when it met in closed session April 11 to discuss paying Huizar’s legal fees.

Print This Post Print This Post

April 17, 2014  Copyright © 2012 Eastern Group Publications, Inc.


One Response to “City Probe Clears Huizar: Godoy Lawsuit Continues”

  1. Teresa Marquez on April 17th, 2014 2:21 pm

    Try again, first the Employer < Huizar, had the power over the employee, and he confess to that, confesing does not make it right. Under the fair labor Union this is against the law, what else is wrong; using tayepayers money to control and keep the relationship, it matters, is moral, and is criminal under the law. The city has to be careful as to how can they find him not guilty, in addition current employees would not go against their employer for fear of retaliation, so all employees will speak of behalf of Huizar. And Godoy cannot speak to this investigating panel in the first place, it is ungoing investigation of law breking issues. I recommend to get another investigating company. this is just a total waste of money, in addition to what we will have to pay for the wrong practice of Huizar. When is it enough, to allow political representatin fund is wrong, there should not be allowed to use taxepaers funds to defend criminal activity of politicians. They should be put on unpaid leave of absense until the trial has been closed.

Comments are intended to further discussion on the article topic. EGPNews reserves the right to not publish, edit or remove comments that contain vulgarities, foul language, personal attacks, racists, sexist, homophobic or other offensive terminology or that contain solicitations, spam, or that threaten harm of any sort. EGPNews will not approve comments that call for or applaud the death, injury or illness of any person, regardless of their public status. Questions regarding this policy should be e-mailed to

 characters available

Copyright © 2018 Eastern Group Publications/EGPNews, Inc. ·