Immigration Reform by Treaty

By Raoul Lowery Contreras

One million dollars-a-minute, sixty minutes an hour, 1440 minutes-a-day, 43,200 minutes-a-month, 518,440 minutes a year, or $518,440,000,000 (That’s Billion with a B) is what trade between the United States and Mexico has grown to in the 20 years since the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) with Mexico began on January 1, 1994.

That is the legal trade; there is illicit trade of drugs, cigarettes, people being secreted across, over and under the border, Americans crossing the border by the thousands every day for medical/dental work and their renting or buying real estate along the thousands of miles of Mexican oceanfront.

Conversely, thousands of Mexicans cross the border legally each day for medical/dental work, shopping and other economic activity that amounts to billions not formally recorded as part of the million-dollars-a-minute mentioned by the Mexican Foreign Secretary the other day in a speech in California.

San Diego County on the California/Mexico border estimates that Mexicans spend $2 billion a year in San Diego that is not counted in the trade statistics.

That trade/economic activity binds the United States and Mexico like no other trade relationship in the world.

So says, Mexico’s Foreign Secretary Jose Antonio Meade Kuribrena in a California speech. He predicts those numbers will improve when the United States conjures up an immigration reform that both counties can benefit from and with.

In that cross-border trade lies solving the immigration conundrum that faces the Republican-controlled House of Representatives; it does so by simply cutting them out.

Though President Obama has proven to truly be disinterested in immigration reform other than as a club against Republicans, he can be useful finally. Only he can negotiate treaties with countries. He only needs concurrence of two-thirds of “present” United States Senators. The House has nothing to do with a treaty. A treaty has the force of the Constitution.

Side Note – The million-dollar-a-minute trade with Mexico today is a far cry from 1846 when United States troops invaded Mexico and claimed land between the Nueces River in Texas which was the border between the Republic of Texas and Mexico for 11 years and the Rio Grande River.

That incursion started the Mexican American War which was planned in Washington with only one purpose — seizure of California (plus, of course, Arizona, New Mexico, Colorado, Utah, Nevada and parts of Kansas and Oklahoma). Defenders of the American-plotted war to acquire those millions of acres of land, declare that Mexico sold all that land freely for the tidy sum of $15 million. We bought it “fair and square” they say. That is only minutely true. American troops occupied Mexico City and announced they would never leave unless Mexico accepted the money and granted all that land to the U.S. “Under duress” comes to mind.

Back to today. President Obama can produce immigration reform by using his exclusive treaty negotiating ability spelled out in the Constitution.

“Article II, Section 2: He (the President) shall have power, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, to make treaties, provided two thirds of Senators present concur…”

Stacks of economic studies by think tanks and universities conclude beyond doubt that the vast number of Mexicans who come to the United States without legal permission come to work, to work at jobs in which collectively there are not enough Americans to do or even want to do even in periods of high unemployment. Thus a treaty between Mexico and the United States that covers employment of their respective citizens in the other country will solve the problem.

A bi-national labor treaty shall be negotiated between the United States and Mexico that allows employers in both countries to hire workers from the other country for temporary or even permanent work.

—The treaty would require the host country to issue work permits to those employees with full right of border ingress, egress and legal residence.

—The treaty would require that the employment minimally meet all national labor laws of the host country.

—The treaty would have a provision for a bi-national commission made up of the U.S. Secretary of State and his/her Mexican counterpart, the Speaker of the U.S. House and his/her Mexican counterpart and the Leader of the U.S. Senate and his/her Mexican counterpart to meet annually to set labor permit numbers for the following year.

—The Treaty would have a provision that Congress make all laws required to implement the treaty.

Only the President can negotiate a treaty. The House cannot vote on it, or amend it, or interfere with it in any way. The Senate must advise and consent only on what the President submits for ratification with “two thirds of the Senators present.”

If we had a President who cared about immigration reform he would commence negotiations with Mexico today.

 

Contreras formerly wrote for the New American News Service of the New York Times. 

 

Print This Post Print This Post

August 7, 2014  Copyright © 2012 Eastern Group Publications, Inc.

Comments

Comments are intended to further discussion on the article topic. EGPNews reserves the right to not publish, edit or remove comments that contain vulgarities, foul language, personal attacks, racists, sexist, homophobic or other offensive terminology or that contain solicitations, spam, or that threaten harm of any sort. EGPNews will not approve comments that call for or applaud the death, injury or illness of any person, regardless of their public status. Questions regarding this policy should be e-mailed to service@egpnews.com.





 characters available

Copyright © 2014 Eastern Group Publications, Inc. · Log in