LAPD Chief Beck Denies Crime Numbers Cover Up

By City News Service

Los Angeles Police Department Chief Charlie Beck onTuesday strongly denied his agency is doctoring violent crime statistics, calling claims by one of his captains that the department is misleading the public on crime rates “lies.”

“They’re not only lies, they’re damn lies,” Beck told reporters.

“Both the department and the inspector general have looked into similar claims as this over the last several years and found no wrongdoing,” the chief said.

Beck was responding to allegations made by LAPD Capt. Lillian Carranza, who filed a legal claim against the city last week and held a news conference with her attorney Monday, accusing the department of engaging in an “elaborate cover-up” to make violent crime rates appear lower than they really are.

“This piece of deception was done specifically to fool the public and elected officials as to the true state of crime in the city of Los Angeles,” Carranza said.

“The department then engaged in a highly complex and elaborate cover-up in an attempt to hide the fact that command officers had been providing false figures to the public, attempting to convince the public that crime had not significantly increased.”

Carranza claims she has been alerting her superiors about discrepancies in violent crime rates for four years, and says she was passed over for a promotion because of it.

Carranza said she first told superiors about underreporting of violent crime in the LAPD’s Foothill area, but after no action was taken, she also reviewed reports and found similar issues in the Pacific, Central, Hollenbeck and Mission divisions.

Beck insisted the department’s numbers are accurate, saying the agency is continuously reviewing its figures to ensure they are correct.

“If I’m cooking the books, I’m not doing a very good job, because we are up a little over 4 percent in violent crime,” Beck said. “If I wanted to cook the books, believe me, we would not be up in violent crime.”

The Los Angeles Police Protective League, the union representing the department’s officers, issued a statement in response to Beck’s comments.

“Chief Beck doth protest too much, the statement said. “In California’s criminal justice system, prior offenses are considered strikes and Chief Beck has accumulated two strikes by overseeing the manipulation of violent crime statistics and this latest allegation, if proven true, would make the chief a three striker.

“It’s time for transparency and honesty to be the foundation of our department, not cooking the books to fool our elected officials and the public.”

Print This Post Print This Post

November 9, 2017  Copyright © 2012 Eastern Group Publications, Inc.


One Response to “LAPD Chief Beck Denies Crime Numbers Cover Up”

  1. Robert Arroyo on February 8th, 2018 1:32 am

    The actions of LAPD Chief Charlie Beck should be taken in context. First of all he stood in front of cameras in uniform and berated a subordinate, LAPD Captain Carranza. He started by saying Carranza’s claims were “untrue” and “outrageous,” and not only “lies, damn lies!!!” He needs to be held accountable for intimidating a subordinate who gave information to LAPD’s Office of Inspector General, and for intimidating a witness to a pending civil case against the City.

    In a press interview, Carranza responded to Beck’s comments and said “When I heard what the Chief had said about me, it heart me, it broke my heart.”

    Chief Beck also violated his Media Relations protocol and discussed a case under current litigation, and displayed “personal feelings” in regards to an employee who is a witness in a pending case. In December 2017 a complaint was sent to the OIG regarding Beck’s intimidation caught on camera. OIG Kevin Rogan unfortunately forward the complaint downstream to Internal Affairs. However, in light of LAPD Manual Volume One 273, notice Rogan should NOT have sent the complaint to IA. Notice anyone intimidating an employee who gives information to the OIG is to be investigated by the Board of Police Commissioners.

    Notice 1/273 also has a special clause for the Chief of Police, instructing that if the misconduct was regarding the Chief, it was not to be sent to IA, and rather up stream. OIG Rogan may have misclassified this similar to the same way crime stats were misclassified, or minimized. In February 2018 it was then pointed out to the OIG that the BOPC needs to investigate Beck’s misconduct, and not Beck’s subordinates as you can see why.

    The OIG was established in 1996 for various reason. Anyone giving information to them should be protected if you want to ensure public trust. Harsh action should be taken against anyone attempting to intimidate witnesses of police misconduct.

Comments are intended to further discussion on the article topic. EGPNews reserves the right to not publish, edit or remove comments that contain vulgarities, foul language, personal attacks, racists, sexist, homophobic or other offensive terminology or that contain solicitations, spam, or that threaten harm of any sort. EGPNews will not approve comments that call for or applaud the death, injury or illness of any person, regardless of their public status. Questions regarding this policy should be e-mailed to

 characters available

Copyright © 2019 Eastern Group Publications/EGPNews, Inc. ·