East Los Angeles resident and immigration rights activist Isabel Medina woke up Tuesday to a text message saying the Supreme Court would review President Obama’s executive action on immigration.
“I was so excited, I woke up my kids and told them about the good news,” Medina told EGP in Spanish. “I called my husband at work and we celebrated one more step forward to legalization.”
Her two U.S. born children—ages seven and nine—didn’t quite comprehend the importance of the decision, she said. “But they were happy and said, ‘Mom, now you can go visit grandma [in Mexico]’” recalled Medina with tears on her eyes.
Lea este artículo en Español: Tribunal Supremo toma el Caso de Inmigración
The Supreme Court justices’ decision to review the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans’ ruling in Texas v. United States gives hope to Medina and as many as five million immigrants in the country illegally who could get temporary relief from deportation under the president’s Deferred Action for Parents of Americans (DAPA) and expanded Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DAPA) programs.
Announced by Obama in November 2014, DACA and DAPA would allow undocumented parents of U.S. born children and lawful permanent residents, and undocumented immigrants who arrived to the country as children and were over the age of 31 in 2012, to obtain protection against deportation and to receive a work permit and social security number.
On February 16, 2015—two days before expanded DACA would take effect— 26 predominately Republican states led by Texas filed a lawsuit to block the programs, claiming that Obama’s executive orders enacting the programs exceeded his authority under the US Constitution.
A Texas judge and the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals panel in New Orleans agreed, stopping the programs from going into effect.
The Obama Administration and 15 states – including California -appealed the Fifth Circuit’s ruling to the Supreme Court.
“We know it’s legal, we know it’s common sense. We know it’s just a lawful exercise of executive discretion that has been legally used by presidents in both parties; [Dwight D.] Eisenhower, [Ronald] Reagan, [George W.] Bush, [Bill] Clinton and of course Obama,” said Angelica Salas, executive director of the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights in Los Angeles (CHIRLA) during a press conference responding to the announcement Tuesday morning.
“[Immigrants] are not hiding, they work hard every single day to support their families and to support this country’s economy…we need to stop deporting men, women and children who work hard,” added Maria Elena Durazo, general vice president for immigration, civil rights and diversity with UNITE HERE.
Justices will likely hear arguments in April; a final decision is expected in June.
In California, about 1.5 million could benefit from DACA and DAPA with about half a million in Los Angeles County, according to Salas.
If the Supreme Courts rules in favor of the Administration, unauthorized immigrants eligible under DACA or DAPA could be faced with a short timeframe for applying for the programs before Obama leaves office and if a Republican replaces him as president January 2017.
Immigration rights activists have been urging people who could qualify for the three-year reprieve from deportation and the right to work legally to gather the documents they will need to apply if the Supreme Courts rules in their favor.
Congresswoman Judy Chu (CA-27), who said she was among those who first urged the president to issue the executive orders, said via a teleconference call Tuesday that the fight continues because “it is the right thing” to do.
“We know we are in the right legally, morally and we stand behind the president’s actions,” she said.
Democratic Caucus Chairman Xavier Becerra (CA-34) said in a statement that the president acted “well within his authority” in proposing commonsense immigration measures.
“For Americans harmed—or simply frustrated—by our broken immigration system, this could be a sign of good news to come,” he said. “I am confident that the Supreme Court will rely on the Constitution and precedent to affirm his actions.”
Los Angeles County Supervisor Hilda Solis supported the president’s efforts by advocating for the formation of a county DACA/DAPA Task Force to implement the president’s orders and to allocate more local resources to assist youth who qualify for DACA.
“Last November, the County Board of Supervisors signed onto an amicus brief urging that the U.S. Supreme Court review the Fifth Circuit’s decision,” she said. “Now is the time to embrace our immigrants because they are vital contributors to our society.”
Medina, visibly joyful during CHIRLA’s press conference, told EGP she will fight relentlessly to be heard and to end her 19 years living in the shadows.
“My children worry about my situation,” Medina said. “At their young age they know what immigration is about and they fear I may not be home one day.”
Southland immigration advocates and elected officials today hailed the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to review a legal challenge that has stalled President Barack Obama’s executive orders extending deportation protection to an estimated 4 million people.
“Immigrants have always been vital to our nation’s spirit of innovation, ingenuity and inclusiveness,” Mayor Eric Garcetti said. “Today’s decision by the Supreme Court to review Texas v. United States brings us another step closer to more fully integrating those residents into American life. I urge the justices to reach a decision that preserves family bonds across our country and speaks to the best of who we are as Americans.”
Rep. Judy Chu, D-Pasadena, said she was among those who urged Obama to issue the executive orders in the first place, and she is looking forward to the review by the nation’s highest court.
“Allowing these aspiring Americans to continue to work and contribute without fear of deportation or being separated from their families is the right thing to do morally, economically and legally,” Chu said.
“I am confident that the Supreme court will uphold President Obama’s programs as lawful exercises of executive discretion.”
In May 2015, a Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals panel in New Orleans upheld an injunction issued in February by U.S. District Judge Andrew Hanen of Texas. That injunction was issued in response to lawsuits filed by 26 states seeking to halt Obama’s executive actions on immigration.
The legal wrangling has suspended implementation of a program that would extend work permits and protection against deportation to parents of U.S.-born children and expand an existing program for immigrants who arrived illegally as children. The programs—often referred to by their acronyms, DAPA and DACA—would affect an estimated half-million Angelenos.
The three-justice panel ruled that the states had sufficient legal ground to bring suit and that the administration failed to show it would be harmed by further delays.
Los Angeles and more than 80 other cities and counties across the country signed on to legal pleadings asking the Supreme Court to review the case.
“The DACA/DAPA programs have the potential to change the circumstances for many undocumented individuals without legal status in the United States,” Los Angeles City Councilman Gil Cedillo said. “In the absence of comprehensive immigration reform, we must take incremental steps to move people out of the shadows.”
California Attorney General Kamala Harris also hailed the decision, calling it “a great day for California and the entire nation.”
“DAPA and expanded DACA, which were a lawful exercise of the president’s authority, will bring law-abiding immigrant families out of the shadows, boost our economy and make communities safer,” Harris said.
Archbishop Jose Gomez, leader of the Catholic Archdiocese of Los Angeles said that speaking as a pastor, the fear of deportation makes life intolerable for millions of families.
The executive actions at issue in this case are temporary and they are no substitute for the comprehensive immigration reform our country needs,” Gomez said. “But these actions would be a measure of mercy, providing peace of mind to nearly 9 million people, including 4.5 million children.”
Southland immigration advocates reacted defiantly Tuesday to a federal appeals court ruling blocking the Obama administration’s plans to extend deportation protection to an estimated 4 million people, while others applauded the decision.
The ruling by a Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals panel in New Orleans upholds an injunction issued in February by U.S. District Judge Andrew Hanen of Texas. That injunction was issued in response to lawsuits filed by 26 states seeking to halt President Barack Obama’s executive actions on immigration.
“We disagree with the court’s myopic ruling and lament the confusion, anger and disappointment it will stir amongst millions of families who have spent much of their lives subjugated by unjust immigration laws,” said Angelica Salas, executive director of the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights of Los Angeles.
The legal wrangling has suspended implementation of a program that would extend work permits and protection against deportation to parents of U.S.-born children and expand an existing program for immigrants who arrived illegally as children. The programs — often referred to by their acronyms, DAPA and DACA — would affect an estimated half-million Angelenos.
The three-justice panel ruled that the states had sufficient legal ground to bring suit and that the administration failed to show it would be harmed by further delays, according to the New York Times.
“Absent the passage of comprehensive immigration reform, our communities will continue to suffer from many of the devastating effects of deportation and family separation,” said Congresswoman Lucille Roybal-Allard, who on Tuesday said she is “disappointed” by the Fifth Circuit’s ruling, “which continues to block President Obama’s legal authority for expansion of DACA and implementation of DAPA.”
In the meantime, both the city and county of Los Angeles have begun to prepare for the programs’ roll-out.
The Board of Supervisors — led by Supervisor Hilda Solis but opposed by Supervisors Mike Antonovich and Don Knabe — filed a “friend of the court” brief in the case calling for the injunction to be lifted. Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti and his New York City counterpart, Bill de Blasio, led a coalition of 73 cities and counties in filing a similar brief.
“Unfortunately, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling means that millions of families will not be able to apply for permits to stay, work legally in this country and become full contributing members of our society,” Solis said. “We hope that the administration will find the most expeditious way to continue fighting this legal challenge to bring a final resolution and relief to these families.
“In the meantime, Los Angeles County will continue to get ready to help over half a million of our residents to apply for this programs when the time comes. And we believe it will,” Attorney General Kamala Harris, who is campaigning for a U.S. Senate seat, said she was disappointed by the appeals court’s ruling.
“President Obama proposed common-sense actions to help address our broken immigration system and provide a path out of the shadows for over one million hard-working undocumented Californians eligible for deferred action,” Harris said.
Antonovich “applauded the court’s decision,” according to his spokesman Tony Bell.
The executive actions amount to “an overreach by the administration,” Bell said, adding that Antonovich hoped the president would “abandon his unilateral action and work with Congress on real immigration reform.”
Supervisors Hilda Solis and Mark Ridley-Thomas recommended that the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department consult with community organizations and re-evaluate its working relationship with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement over the next 90 days.
“I see this as an opportunity to move forward because we have a new sheriff. We have a new board,” Solis said.
Supervisor Sheila Kuehl also voted her support for terminating the 2014 agreement, while Supervisors Michael Antonovich and Don Knabe cast the dissenting votes.
As the existing agreement – dubbed Secure Communities and often referred to in shorthand as 287(g) – is terminated, the board asked McDonnell to “continue cooperating with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security in implementing the president’s Priority Enforcement Program.”
The second vote was 4-1, with Kuehl dissenting. She and many community activists said they see little difference between the two programs.
“It’s a distinction without a difference,” Kuehl said, with ICE agents waiting outside the jail for a “warm handoff” instead of working inside the jails.
“It is a strange day when the county Board of Supervisors takes a step forward and three steps back on immigration,” said Angelica Salas, executive director of the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights of Los Angeles. “With today’s votes, the BOS has closed the door shut on a disgraced deportation dragnet, but left every window open by allowing the PEP program to replace (it).”
Others, including civil rights advocate Dolores Huerta, disagreed.
“Ending this program is a huge, major step in treating our immigrants the right way,” Huerta told the board.
Meanwhile, McDonnell, who did not attend Tuesday’s hearing, has not explicitly agreed to remove ICE agents from the inmate processing center at the Twin Towers Correctional Facility, though Solis and the county’s lead attorney said they believed he would do so.
In a statement Monday, McDonnell pledged to balance public safety with building community trust.
“Our department must work closely and cooperatively with federal authorities to identify and assist with the lawful investigation and prosecution of undocumented persons who pose a danger to our community,” the sheriff said. “We must also bear in mind at all times the importance of preserving community relationships as well as the due process rights of those in our custody.”
Federal officials announced back in November that Secure Communities would be discontinued in favor of PEP.
In a memo to the then-ICE Acting Director Thomas Winkowski, DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson said Secure Communities “is widely misunderstood and is embroiled in litigation; its very name has become a symbol for general hostility toward the enforcement of our immigration laws.”
In their motion, Solis and Ridley-Thomas said the county should “trust, but verify,” with regard to PEP.
The Priority Enforcement Program still uses fingerprint data from local arrests to check immigration status, though at booking rather than release.
Information on more inmates is shared with ICE under the PEP program, sheriff’s Chief Eric Parra told the board.
However, only undocumented immigrants who pose “a demonstrable risk to national security” or who have been convicted of, not just arrested for, certain crimes are to be targeted for deportation under the new rules.
The list does not include crimes related solely to illegal immigration. However, it does include all felonies, aggravated felonies, convictions of three or more misdemeanors or of a single “significant misdemeanor,” including domestic violence, sexual abuse, burglary, unlawful possession of a firearm, drug distribution, driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs or any conviction carrying a sentence of at least 90 days.
Under the California TRUST Act, which took effect last year in an effort to protect inmates’ right to due process, inmates are not to be detained beyond the end of their scheduled release date. Instead, ICE is notified in advance of an inmates’ pending release.
Community activists said collaboration with ICE undermines community trust and separates families.
Family members of those victimized and killed by undocumented immigrants made emotional pleas for the enforcement of 287(g), chiding the board for not prioritizing citizens over those in the country illegally.
The Sheriff’s Department has leeway to act on his own without board approval.
“The sheriff has complete control over the jails and everybody in them,” County Counsel Mark Saladino told the board.
A group of California legislatures presented a 10-bill package Tuesday to reinforce the protection of undocumented immigrants and fight the “paralyzing politics” of Congress that has stalled the approval of immigration reform.
“In California we are around 40 million residents, the majority who have origins in Mexico, Central America and Asia. That is why today we are presenting a packet of 10 bills to protect undocumented immigrants,” Sen. Pro Tem Kevin de León told EFE Tuesday.
“With these proposed bills we want to make it clear throughout the country that in California we are inclusive and that with arms wide open we accept all immigrants who come to work to provide a better life for their families,” he said during a phone interview from Sacramento.
The press conference announcing the “Immigrants Shape California” legislative package was streamed live on YouTube and jointly chaired by Assembly Speaker Toni Atkins. Authors from both the senate and assembly outlined key details of their bills.
The senate leader is the author of Senate Bill 674, the Immigrant Victims of Crime Equity Act. “With this bill, the police or sheriff will have to provide a copy of the criminal complaints to undocumented [immigrant] applying for a U-Visa” to stay in the country, the senator explained. In “some cities the police refuse to provide the copy to undocumented individuals [who are he victims of crime] and there is no law to require them.”
A copy of the police report documenting domestic violence, aggravated assaults, and other crimes is required to apply for the federal Victims of Crime Visa (U-Visa).
The package of bills includes “Health Care for All,” a bill by Sen. Ricardo Lara (D-Bell Gardens), that would give low-income undocumented immigrants access to Medi-Cal and higher income immigrants the ability to purchase unsubsidized health insurance from the state health care exchange, Covered California. It also contains various civil rights protections including for migrant children, and protections against “unscrupulous” employers. It also establishes the California Office of New Americans, which will focus on integrating immigrants into society.
“These laws that we are proposing in California could pass in The House, but they need the desire” to get it done, said De León, referring to immigration reform being stalled in Washington D.C.
The senator explained that is the reason “the bills were introduced in California with the hope that other states follow the lead.”
Joseph Villela, director of the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights of Los Angeles (CHIRLA) told EFE that “the paralyzed politics of legislators in Washington D.C. has made legislators move forward with these bills in California.”
He explained that since November a dozen organizations have united with senators and assemblymembers in California to present this bill package.
Villela divided the packaged of 10 bills into two categories: liberty and justice. “The package of liberty is for those undocumented immigrants to feel welcomed in California and to not fear going out into the streets,” he said.
EGP staff writers contributed to this report.
The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors voted Tuesday to create a task force to plan for implementation of President Barack Obama’s immigration orders, despite a court order halting the programs.
If the two executive orders clear legal hurdles, they could defer deportation for nearly 500,000 Los Angeles-area residents
Supervisors Hilda Solis and Sheila Kuehl recommended the task force, which will include employees from departments that manage voting, consumer fraud, property taxes, hospitals, community and senior services, parks and libraries. Supervisor Michael Antonovich dissented in the 4-1 vote, saying the effort was premature.
“People have asked me, `Why now?”’ Solis said. “My response is, ‘Why not now?’ We need to prepare our community.”
While talking about the economic benefits of the immigration changes, Solis also raised concerns about fraud perpetrated by those looking to take advantage of immigrants when the programs roll out.
Research by UCLA’s North American Integration and Development Center estimate that offering work permits to roughly 466,000 immigrants in Los Angeles County could generate another $1.1 billion in tax revenues and 38,500 jobs.
“We would essentially legalize $25 billion … it would come out of the shadows and become part of the formal economy,” UCLA Associate Professor Raul Hinojosa-Ojeda told the board.
Hinojosa-Ojeda said immigration is “by no means solely a Mexican issue,” noting that “one out of every seven Asians in this country is undocumented.”
The two programs — Expanded Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) and Deferred Action for Parental Accountability and Lawful Permanent Residents (DAPA) — would allow an estimated 3.7 million parents of U.S.-born and resident children and another roughly 300,000 immigrants who arrived illegally as children to apply for work permits and temporary protection from deportation. Those totals are based on estimates from the Migration Policy Institute.
More than 600,000 people have already qualified under the 2012 DACA program, which offers protections to young people who were illegally brought to the U.S. as children. That total represents about half of those eligible for the program.
The age cap under that program would be eliminated under the latest executive action.
The new programs were set to start accepting applications Feb. 18, but a federal district court judge in Texas issued an injunction halting the program, ruling in favor of 20-plus states, led by Texas, that challenged the executive actions.
Antonovich said he believes “immigration is vital to this country,” but the county should wait for the legal battle to play out.
Solis reminded her colleagues about the “fierce fight” around the original DACA order, while Kuehl said she was “confident” that the courts would ultimately approve the President’s action.
“We will not wait to prepare,” Kuehl said.
Supervisor Mark Ridley-Thomas, who joined Solis and Kuehl at a morning news conference to highlight his commitment to immigration, said the task force was “our opportunity to telegraph to the nation that we get it … Let’s accord everyone who we can a sense of dignity and respect.”
Los Angeles County Federation of Labor leader Rusty Hicks offered his union’s support.
“There is much about life that we don’t control. we don’t control the color of our skin, where we are born or who our parents are,” Hicks said, urging the supervisors to “keep (the) promise” of immigration.
Mayor Eric Garcetti’s chief of immigrant affairs called Los Angeles “the epicenter for the implementation.” Garcetti, who has joined the mayors of several other cities in support of DACA and DAPA, had already reached out to county departments to coordinate, Solis said.
“Enrollment will result in economic gains and safer communities,” Garcetti chief Linda Lopez told the board.
In addition to objections raised in legal challenges to Obama’s action, those opposed to the task force raised concerns about immigrants competing for jobs and other resources.
“The county of Los Angeles has the highest poverty rate of any county in the state,” resident Kevin Lynn said. “If the optimistic projections that were voiced earlier … were anything but delusion, wouldn’t this county be experiencing less poverty and more prosperity?”
Those protected under the program would not be eligible for federal public benefits such as financial aid, food stamps or housing subsidies. Whether they would be eligible for state aid would be decided on a state-by-state basis.
Antonovich said he expected that the immigration changes would ultimately end up costing the county money.
“Counties, cities and states have to pick up the tab,” Antonovich said.
House Republicans on Wednesday narrowly approved five amendments aimed at overturning President Obama’s executive orders on immigration that would temporarily protect as many as 5 million undocumented immigrants from deportation.
The amendments were attached to a $40 billion funding bill for the Department of Homeland Security, approved by a vote of 236-191.
Lawmakers voted 218-209 in favor of an amendment to eliminate funding for the president’s 2012 deferred action (DACA) program to allow hundreds of thousands of young undocumented immigrants brought illegally to the U.S. as children through no choice of their own, often referred to as DREAMers, to avoid deportation and receive work permits.
Another of the amendments would derail the Obama’s executive action last Novemeber extending DACA protections to the parents of U.S. born children.
It’s estimated that nearly 5 million immigrants in the country illegally would benefit from the two programs.
Saying Pres. Obama had gone too far when he used his executive powers to take action on immigration, House Speaker, John Boehner, said Republicans “had no choice” but to take action and overturn his orders.
However, about two-dozen Republicans voted against the proposal because their districts have a large number of Latinos.
The measures are expected to face a tough fight in the Senate, according to many observers.
The bill could also face a presidential veto, as Obama has warned.
Rep. Mark Takano, a Democrat, said the vote by House Republicans’ comes following their refusal “to vote on the comprehensive immigration reform bill that passed the Senate with a bipartisan vote.”
He said the “changes to the Department of Homeland Security funding bill will separate families, end DACA, deport DREAMers and parents, instead of criminals, send American children to foster care, and harm our economy.”
El presidente, Barack Obama, invitó el último mes del 2014 a la oposición republicana a trabajar juntos y les recordó que, para sacar adelante leyes en migración o salario mínimo el Congreso tiene que contar con su firma.
En su última conferencia de prensa del año, Obama recogió las críticas de los republicanos y afirmó que “no existen evidencias” de que, si no hubiera sido por sus acciones ejecutivas, el Congreso menos productivo de la historia del país hubiera aprobado más leyes.
“Pretendo continuar con lo que he estado haciendo hasta ahora, que es ver cuáles son los grandes problemas y oportunidades para ayudar al pueblo estadounidense y seguiré aportando ayuda dentro de la autoridad que me confiere la ley”, defendió el mandatario.
Obama cree que “hay grandes oportunidades” dentro del Congreso para lograr acuerdos entre demócratas y republicanos, y destacó que los estadounidenses quieren ver a los dos partidos trabajando juntos.
“Prefiero hacerlo con ustedes”, dijo directamente a los republicanos, y prometió que seguirá conversando con ellos y con el resto de miembros del Congreso para invitarles a alcanzar acuerdos.
El presidente puso como ejemplo la ley sobre migración, que recibió el apoyo de los dos partidos en el Senado, pero que luego bloquearon los republicanos en la Cámara de Representantes.
“Estaba muy contento cuando el Senado aprobó una ley completa y con el apoyo de los dos partidos sobre inmigración. Hice todo lo posible durante un año y medio para dar a los republicanos el espacio para actuar”, afirmó el mandatario.
“Les mostré una gran paciencia y flexibilidad diciéndoles: vean si quieren hacer cambios específicos, estamos dispuestos a comprometernos, estamos dispuestos a ser pacientes y trabajar con ustedes”.
Pero nada se aprobó finalmente y, ante los dos últimos años de su mandato que restan con un Congreso republicano, Obama recordó a la oposición que existe una “solución simple” si sus acciones ejecutivas “les están molestando”.
“Aprueben leyes y trabajen conmigo para asegurarse de que firmo esas leyes. Porque ambas partes van a tener que comprometerse en muchos de esos temas. Para que sus iniciativas se conviertan en ley, voy a tener que firmarlas”, subrayó Obama.
Con todo, el mandatario dijo ser consciente de que habrá desacuerdos y prometió a los republicanos que encontrarán su oposición si tratan de “arrebatar el seguro médico a las personas que acaban de obtenerlo” o si intentan rebajar la protección de los consumidores.
“Diré que no -zanjó-, y estoy seguro de que voy a ser capaz de mantener los vetos de ese tipo de disposiciones”.
Rosa Martinez is not sure what she will be doing today for Thanksgiving.
Her family works long hours and money is short this year, so a big Thanksgiving dinner with the family may not be an option.
But no matter what she is doing, the sixty-seven-year-old undocumented immigrant says she will take time to give thanks that she is in this country, despite being among the 6 million undocumented who will not benefit from President Obama’s executive action on immigration.
On Monday, Martinez was busy gluing small pieces of brightly colored tiles to a mosaic mural, but happily broke from the task to listen to co-workers who gushed about how “very lucky” she was to not only see, but to touch Pres. Obama last Friday.
“Obama held both of my hands with his hands,” said Martinez excitedly, adding that “His hands were very cold.”
She told EGP it’s hard to explain the mixture of joy and sadness she felt watching Obama greet the nearly 2000 people gathered at Del Sol High School in Las Vegas to hear details of his newly announced immigration reform orders.
It’s estimated five million people in the country illegally for at least five years will be able to avoid deportation for three years, if they are the parent of a U.S. citizen or permanent resident, the spouse or child of a lawful permanent resident, or were brought to the country illegally as a child.
“The bottom line is, mass amnesty would be unfair, but mass deportation would be both impossible and contrary to our country’s character,” said the president during his speech at Del Sol High School. “This is not just a Latino issue, this is an American issue,” Obama said.
Lea este artículo en Español: Presidente Obama Comienza a Detallar Su Plan de Acción Ejecutiva
Martinez told EGP she won’t qualify for the president’s executive action because none of her six (adult) children living in the U.S. were born here nor are they permanent residents. But she’s ecstatic that three of her children will qualify because they have U.S. born children.
“Hopefully they can also travel and visit my mother,” said Martinez who hasn’t seen her mother in 14 years.
Martinez was one of two people from the Koreatown Immigrant Workers Alliance (KIWA) to travel with 30 members of the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights of Los Angeles (CHIRLA) to Las Vegas to hear the president speak.
“I want to make sure that [the president] doesn’t forget about us, the ones who didn’t qualify,” said Martinez, echoing statements welcoming the president’s actions but saying it does not go far enough.
Sen. Bob Menendez (D-NJ), one of eight senators who pushed for a bi-partisan immigration reform measure in 2013, was also in Las Vegas to hear Obama’s speech. He told EGP there is still time for the Congress to act, but added that of House Speaker John Boehner refuses to bring the Senate’s immigration reform bill up for a vote. Democrats will work very hard to ensure “everybody eligible” under the president’s executive action who qualifies for deferred action applies, Menendez said.
“Republicans cannot repeal” the president’s order if millions of people have signed on, “there’s a greater security in numbers,” he said.
The president’s action has received push back from Republicans and others who claim his actions are unconstitutional. About 20 people protested across the street from the high school where the president was speaking. They carried banners calling him the “emperor,” referring to his acting unilaterally. “Americans only welcome ‘legal’ residents to the country,” protesters said.
Wendy Willis told EGP she was very upset with the president’s order. “It felt like a slap in the face,” she said angrily. “[Illegals] should stand in line. My friend waited in line for years, they should do the same thing,” Willis said.
“Send them back,” anti-immigrant protesters yelled repeatedly.
Ben Monterroso, executive director of Mi Familia Vota, a non-profit organization dedicated to promoting social and economic justice through civic engagement, called the president’s actions “historical.”
“I hope I can see the same commitment from the Republicans, that instead of blocking what the president has done, they find a solution because we need a bill,” he said.
During a conference call with the media Tuesday, Marielena Incapie, executive director of the National Immigration Law Center, said although the order is temporary, it’s “a huge victory.”
She also cautioned against scam artists who will try to take advantage of people.
“There’s nothing to apply for at the moment, there’s no reason to pay for anything,” she explained, adding the plan will not go into effect until 2015.
“It is estimated that DACA expansion applications will start on Feb. 20 and the rest on May 20,” said Incapie.
“People tell the immigrant community that if they pay a fee now they can get in front of the line. That’s a lie,” echoed Sally Kinoshita, deputy director with the Immigrant Legal Resource Center in San Francisco.
As for Martinez, she still has hope that action will eventually be taken to help people like her, searching for a better life and willing to work hard.
“We couldn’t get the whole group today, but one day we will.”
Who will benefit:
- Parents with U.S. born children or permanent residents—who came to the U.S. before 2010—will obtain a relief from deportation and receive a work permit for three years.
- Deferred Action for Children Arrivals (DACA) will expand to people who came to the U.S. before the age of 16 (prior to January 1st, 2010) Allowing them to apply for a work permit and social security number, no matter their current age.
- Spouses and children of lawful permanent residents can apply for a waiver to stay in the U.S. while waiting for their green card, without the need to wait outside the country.
- Those who qualify for executive action may be able to travel outside the country with an authorization called Advanced Parole.
Steps to take:
- Applicants must pass a background check
- Show proof of residency and relationship of U.S. born/permanent resident children where applicable
- Pay an application fee (estimated $465 + attorney’s fees)
- Start paying taxes
Who does not qualify for the Executive Action:
- Individuals who do not have children born in U.S. or children who are permanent residents
- Individuals who only have DACA qualified –‘Dreamer’- children
- Dreamers who arrived to the country after the age of 16
- Farmworkers with no children
The application process has not yet been announced. People can stay up to date by checking the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services website at www.uscis.gov/es/accionmigratoria. They should also confirm the lawyer the hire specializes in immigration. This can be done http://www.calbar.ca.gov/Public/LawyerReferralServicesLRS.aspx.
Una organización de Los Ángeles lanzó el sábado una campaña con miras a otorgar una “protección permanente” a los “dreamers” que cuentan con un permiso de residencia temporal, ante al peligro de que los jóvenes indocumentados pierdan este beneficio cuando el próximo mandatario del país empiece a ejercer funciones.
“Pedimos una resolución del presidente Obama que garantice la estabilidad y un permiso permanente de residencia para estos jóvenes que se han beneficiado del Programa de Acción Diferida [DACA]”, dijo a Efe Osvaldo Cabrera, director de la Coalición Latinoamericana Internacional (CLI), entidad que promueve la iniciativa.
La campaña se hizo pública el sábado en un acto celebrado en la Placita Olvera del centro de Los Ángeles, con motivo de la celebración del Día de la Madre, y quiere recoger firmas de votantes registrados en los próximos tres meses que serán presentadas luego en la Casa Blanca y el Congreso.
“Estaremos buscando las firmas de los ciudadanos que estén de acuerdo con apoyar estos jóvenes en una docena de estados, con mayoría de población latina, para mostrarle al presidente y al Congreso que la gente estadounidense respalda esta iniciativa”, explicó Cabrera.
Entre el mes de agosto de 2012, cuando comenzaron a recibirse las solicitudes para el programa DACA, y el término del primer trimestre de 2014 se aceptaron más de 610.000 aplicaciones para este beneficio migratorio, puesto en marcha tras una orden administrativa emitida por el presidente Obama.
De acuerdo al último reporte de los servicios de Inmigración y Ciudadanía, del total de solicitudes presentadas se han aprobado alrededor de 521.000 expedientes.
Con cerca de 154.000 aplicaciones, California es el estado con más solicitudes aprobadas, un dato que impulsó a los organizadores a lanzar su campaña desde Los Ángeles, una de las ciudades del país con mayor población indocumentada.