L.A. County Contributes $1 Million to Immigrant Defense Fund

June 22, 2017 by · Leave a Comment 

The Board of Supervisors voted Tuesday to contribute $1 million to a legal aid fund for people at risk of deportation and confirmed that anyone convicted of a violent felony will not be eligible to benefit from the fund.

The eligibility requirements for the county’s share of the L.A. Justice Fund — specifically the prohibition of convicted felons — drew protests from immigration advocates in April and forced the board to cancel a planned vote on the matter.

Civil rights advocates opposed to the exclusion said it amounted to unequal representation and ignored the fact that immigrants often “plead up” to more serious crimes based on legal advice that the crimes are “immigration-safe.”

Though the board and other contributors to the L.A. Justice Fund have cited the threat of new immigration policies of President Donald Trump, protesters accused county officials of playing into Trump’s framework of “good” and “bad” immigrants.

The board’s vote Tuesday focused on finalizing an agreement with the California Community Foundation to act as the county’s intermediary in granting ,aid. That agreement included an exhibit spelling out the eligibility criteria.

In addition to prohibiting those with a felony conviction and reserving aid for low-income immigrants, the county will prioritize help for: individuals with community ties to Los Angeles County, such as family members who are U.S. citizens;

— heads of households with one or more dependent family members;

— unaccompanied children and young adults who arrived as children;

— veterans;

— individuals with protection-based claims, such as refugees seeking asylum; and

— victims of crime, domestic violence and human trafficking.

Supervisor Hilda Solis said an estimated 7,000 county residents face deportation proceedings without a lawyer every year.

“The legal system is often-times tricky and can be difficult to navigate. On top of that, if you are an immigrant facing deportation, you are likely to speak a different language, be unfamiliar with complicated legal processes and be unable to afford a lawyer to represent you,” Solis said. “Today, the board took a significant step to create a safety net for immigrants, one that is pro-family, pro-economic growth and stability, and pro-civil and human rights.”

The Boston Immigrant Justice Initiative found that it costs about $5,000 in legal fees on average to contest a civil deportation case.

“… Increasingly aggressive tactics underscore the need to provide legal representation for immigrants facing deportation, particularly for individuals who have no criminal history and are unfamiliar with complicated legal processes such as removal proceedings,” stated Congresswoman Nanette Diaz Barragán and 19 other members of Congress in a letter addressed to the County Board of Supervisors that urged approval of the legal aid funding. The letter went on to urge supervisors to disperse funds “to legal service providers as soon as possible.”

According to a study conducted by the California Coalition for Universal Representation, 68 percent of detained immigrants in California are unrepresented. The same study determined detained immigrants who had lawyers avoided deportation more than five times as often in comparison to their unrepresented counterparts.

Niels Frenzen, director of USC’s Gould School of Law Immigration Clinic, said the county’s money would free up other funds for immigrants with prior convictions.

“When there are limited funds, it’s not always possible to provide for the representation of everyone facing removal proceedings,” Frenzen said. “However, the county’s contribution to the L.A. Justice Fund provides significant new funding for immigrants under the threat of deportation who do not have felony records, which in turn frees providers to use non-L.A. Justice Fund funds to represent other immigrants, including those with criminal histories.”

The L.A. Justice Fund is aiming to raise $10 million. The county intends to contribute an additional $2 million in fiscal year 2018-19 and the city of Los Angeles has tentatively committed $2 million, an amount approved by a council committee Monday.

Los Angeles Councilman Gil Cedillo applauded recent progress in making city funds available to the L.A. Justice Fund.

“I am grateful that my colleagues on the Budget Committee recognize the urgency to expend these funds, and hope for the same outcome during the full council vote on Friday,” said the first district councilman in a press release.

The city’s criteria also excludes anyone convicted of or appealing a conviction for a violent felony, however, some council members asked for clarification on that point before a vote by the full council.

Private entities are expected to contribute the remainder of the $10million and can set their own rules for eligibility. The board’s vote was 4-1, with Supervisor Kathryn Barger dissenting.

“Our federal immigration system is broken,” Barger said. “It is the federal government’s responsibility to support states and counties in their efforts to address the costs of illegal immigration… County taxpayers should not be forced to bear the cost to provide free legal representation for those facing deportation.”

On a separate front, the ICE out of CD1 Coalition — which includes Cedillo’s office, businesses and community groups — will hold a Legal & Resource Fair Saturday in Highland Park aimed at “formulating the pathway of resistance in Council District 1.” The event will take place from 1p.m. to 3 p.m. at 5601 N. Figueroa St., and will include speakers, legal resources and a live question and answer session.

For more information, contact Conrado Terrazas from Cedillo’s office at (213) 550-1538. RSVP to: bit.ly/ICEJune24

 

EGP staff writer Natalie Jiménez contributed to this story.

 

Baca Sentenced to 3 Years in Federal Prison

May 12, 2017 by · Leave a Comment 

Former Los Angeles County Sheriff Lee Baca was sentenced today to three years in prison and one year of supervised release for obstructing a federal probe into corruption in the jails, with a judge lashing out at the longtime lawman and calling him an embarrassment to the profession.

Baca, 74, was also ordered to pay a $7,500 fine.

Baca’s attorneys had asked that he serve only home detention, and they have vowed to appeal his conviction. His attorney filed papers this week urging that the ex-sheriff be allowed to remain free pending arguments before the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.

U.S. District Judge Percy Anderson, however, ordered Baca to surrender to begin serving his prison term on July 25.

(EGP photo archive)

(EGP photo archive)

Baca was convicted March 15 of obstruction of justice and two other federal charges for his role in the scheme to thwart the FBI probe into inmate mistreatment in the jails that he ran, and of lying to the FBI.

After about two days of deliberations, a criminal jury in downtown Los Angeles – the second to hear the case – found that Baca authorized and condoned a multi-part scheme that now has resulted in the conviction of 10 former members of the Sheriff’s Department.

During his two trials, prosecutors described Baca as being the top figure in the conspiracy, which also involved his former right-hand man, Paul Tanaka, and eight deputies who took orders from the sheriff.

Baca showed no emotion as Anderson handed down the sentence. At one point, he nodded at his wife, but Baca did not speak during the hearing.

Prosecutors had asked for a two-year prison term, noting that they would ordinarily seek about four years, but took into account Baca’s age and diagnosis of being in the early stages of Alzheimer’s disease. During the sentencing hearing, however, Anderson lashed out at Baca and said if it hadn’t
been for the ex-lawman’s health, Baca would have received the same five-year term given to his former second-in-command, Paul Tanaka.

Anderson told Baca his Alzheimer’s diagnosis is not a “get-out-of-jail-free card.”

The judge referred to the “lasting damage you caused our community and the sheriff’s department,” saying Baca’s actions were taken “to burnish your legacy – all at the expense of the public’s trust.”

“Your loyalty was perverted,” the judge said, adding, “Your actions embarrass the thousands of men and women who put their lives on the line every day.”

Speaking to reporters outside court, Baca thanked his wife, his attorneys and “the people of Los Angeles County,” saying he has continued to hear words of support from the public.

“I would like to say that for me, it was an honor to serve the county of Los Angeles for over 48 years,” he said.

Baca did not specifically address comments made by Anderson, but said he was honored “to see the performance of such wonderful people that are deputy sheriff’s in the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department.”

“I’m grateful for their willingness to sacrifice many, many hours without pay to continue to do their jobs,” Baca said, adding that he has been “a blessed person.”

In a pre-sentencing memorandum, prosecutors wrote that in helping derail the FBI probe, Baca “abused the great power the citizens of Los Angeles County had given him,” while false statements made during a sworn interview with investigators was a “deliberate attempt to deflect blame and place it entirely on the shoulders of others within his department,” the prosecution wrote in pre-sentencing documents.

In its papers requesting a probationary term in home detention with community service, the defense cited Baca’s decades of public service, diagnosis of early stage Alzheimer’s disease and “peripheral” role in the wide-ranging conspiracy.

Attorney Nathan Hochman asked the judge to consider “an individual with one of this country’s most exceptional public service careers spanning over almost 50 years, an individual who suffers from the incurable and rapidly progressing and debilitating mental health disease of Alzheimer’s, and an
individual for whom prison will not allow him to obtain medical care in the most effective manner and will subject him to especially harsh treatment due to his medical condition as well to his age and former position as LASD Sheriff.”

Hochman spoke for nearly an hour during the sentencing hearing, asking that his client be spared prison time. But his request was sternly rejected.

Baca – who ran the nation’s largest sheriff’s department for more than 15 years – was first tried in December on obstruction of justice and conspiracy to obstruct justice counts, and prosecutors had planned a second trial on the false statements count. But a mistrial was declared after jurors
deadlocked 11-1 in favor of acquitting the former sheriff, and Anderson combined all three counts in the retrial. Baca did not take the stand in either trial.

The charges stemmed from events six years ago when a cellphone was discovered in the hands of an inmate at the Men’s Central Jail. Sheriff’s deputies quickly tied the phone to the FBI, which had been conducting a secret probe of brutality against inmates.

At that point, sheriff’s officials closed ranks and began an attempt to halt the formerly covert investigation by concealing an inmate-turned-informant from federal prosecutors, who had issued a summons for his grand jury appearance.

In a final statement of defiance – and a pointed criticism of the FBI’s smuggling of a phone to the jailhouse informant – Baca told reporters outside court Friday, “I will never accept a cell phone in a county jail given to a career criminal. I don’t care who puts it in.”

The charges involved a host of illegal acts, including a 2011 incident in which two sheriff’s investigators confronted an FBI agent in the driveway leading to her apartment and falsely told her they were in the process of obtaining a warrant for her arrest. Baca denied having advance knowledge of the illicit attempt to intimidate the federal agent.

Prior to the first trial, Baca had pleaded guilty to the lying count, but subsequently backed out of a plea deal – which called for him to serve no more than six months in prison – after the judge rejected the agreement as too lenient. If Baca had not withdrawn from the plea, he could have been handed a
sentence of five years behind bars. He was then indicted on the three felony counts for which he was subsequently convicted.

Prosecutors described the defendant as “a study in contrasts. He championed certain reforms in the criminal justice system, yet ignored warnings that his deputies were committing serious abuses in the Los Angeles County jails. He touted his close relationship with federal officials, yet was angry
that the federal government was investigating his department. He recited the LASD’s ‘Core Values’ – which emphasize honor and integrity – during the same interview in which he lied to the federal government.”

While physically fit and able to function in his daily life, prosecutors wrote, Baca now faces “an uncertain prognosis for how quickly his mild cognitive impairment will advance.”

In his argument for a non-custodial sentence, Hochman wrote that Baca’s condition would be best treated outside of prison.

Baca became sheriff in December 1998 and won re-election on several occasions. He was poised to run again in 2014, but federal indictments unsealed in December 2013, related to excessive force in the jails and obstruction of that investigation, led Baca to retire the following month.

In his request that Baca remain free pending appeal, Hochman argued that he is not likely to flee and poses no danger to the community.

The defense attorney further wrote that his appeal is justified because the court erred in barring jurors from hearing evidence of Baca’s “cooperation” with both the federal probe and an independent county review board, and that the panel should have heard about the ex-sheriff’s Alzheimer’s
diagnosis.

Hochman also claimed the jury should have been allowed to consider evidence of improvements Baca made in the training of jail guards to de-escalate problems and successfully deal with violent and/or mentally ill inmates. Baca was not charged with any instances of jail brutality.

Child Deaths Up in Latest Los Angeles County Report on Abuse

May 11, 2017 by · 1 Comment 

The number of children killed at the hands of a parent, relative or caregiver in Los Angeles County rose to 18 in 2015, up from 15 the previous year, while suicides among kids and teens more than doubled, according to reports released Wednesday.

The reports on child abuse and child deaths also found that the number of children referred to authorities for suspected abuse or neglect decreased slightly in 2015, and auto-pedestrian collisions caused the most accidental child deaths that year.

As part of the reports, county officials recommended that family service agencies, prosecutors and law enforcement begin tracking and reporting data involving children and families impacted by domestic violence. Researchers also recommended that law enforcement share all domestic violence cases with the Department of Children and Family Services when children live in the home.

Domestic violence is prevalent in nearly all child abuse and child fatality cases, said Deanne Tilton Durfee, executive director of the Inter-Agency Council on Child Abuse and Neglect, which complied the reports.

Children “living with adversity,” including violence, discrimination, cruelty or substance abuse, are most at risk and face life-long repercussions — if they survive, Durfee said.

Meanwhile, the reports noted that unsafe infant sleep practices — including bed sharing — and/or unsafe environments accounted for about half of all undetermined child deaths. More than half of the 189 children who died in 2015 were under age 5.

The increase in youth suicides in the county from 10 such deaths in 2014 to 23 in 2015 is consistent with national trends that suggest middle school students are as likely to die by their own hand as they are from traffic accidents, according to one of the reports. The youngest children to commit suicide were 13 years old. The most common method was hanging.

There was a slight dip in the number of children referred to DCFS, from 181,926 in 2014 to 175,383 in 2015.

Officials deemed the county’s Safe Surrender Program — instituted to eliminate abandoned infant deaths — a success, citing the lack of any such deaths last year or in the first months of this year.

New cases brought to Juvenile Dependency Court showed a decrease from 2014, and the 15,203 children exiting the system in 2015 was a greater tally than the number of those entering.

About 535 cases of child abuse involving juveniles were referred to the District Attorney’s Office in 2015. Prosecutors filed charges in 181 of those cases, with nearly all of them felonies.

Officials also called for legislation to require training in recognizing and reporting child abuse as a pre-requisite for medical licensing.

“The worst report of child abuse is the one that’s never made,” Durfee said.

 

Tourism Adds Billions to L.A. County Economy

May 10, 2017 by · Leave a Comment 

The Los Angeles Tourism & Convention Board announced Tuesday that a record-setting 47.3 million visitors injected an all-time-high $21.9 billion into Los Angeles County’s economy in 2016.

The new visitor spending milestone is $1.3 billion more than 2015’s total, an increase of 6.3 percent, according to the local tourism board, which timed the announcement to coincide with National Travel and Tourism Week.

Traveler spending generated $33.6 billion in total economic impact for Los Angeles County, including induced and indirect benefits, according to the nonprofit tourism/ marketing board.

Tourism supports 510,500 jobs within the Leisure & Hospitality sector in the region, according to the board, which reported the industry contributed to the addition of 21,400 new jobs last year – a 4.4 percent year-over-year increase.

“This is L.A.’s moment. We’re breaking tourism records every year, and this is only the beginning,” said Mayor Eric Garcetti. “This National Travel and Tourism Week, we are celebrating our thriving tourism industry and looking ahead at the limitless opportunity to come with attractions like the Lucas Museum and a potential Summer Olympics that will cement Los Angeles’ standing
as the world’s best destination.”

L.A. County’s average occupancy rate for 2016 reached 81.3 percent, surpassing 80 percent for the first time in county history, with a record 29.2 million hotel room nights sold countywide.

City of L.A. hotel visitors generated $268 million in transient-occupancy tax collections for the city, which welcomed a record 47.3 million visitors in 2016. Of that number, 40.3 million were domestic visitors and 7 million were international visitors.

Civil Rights Advocates Condemn Board of Supervisors

April 13, 2017 by · Leave a Comment 

The Board of Supervisors delayed a vote Tuesday on $1 million in legal support for residents facing deportation after advocates protested a provision excluding individuals convicted of violent crimes.

The board also voted Tuesday to explore its authority to limit federal immigration enforcement at schools, courthouses and hospitals, a move praised by immigration rights advocates.

Supervisors Hilda Solis and Sheila Kuehl recommended the potential push-back against immigration enforcement, saying the county has a fundamental interest in ensuring access to service for all residents.

Their motion highlighted the case of Romulo Avelica-Gonzalez, a 48-year-old father of four U.S. citizens who was detained by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents while driving two of his daughters to school.

ICE reported that Avelica-Gonzalez was ordered to be deported in 2014 because of multiple criminal convictions, including for DUI in 2009. ICE also said he was arrested about a half-mile from the school.

Immigration rights advocates praised the board’s willingness to resist what they characterized as aggressive federal immigration enforcement. However, eligibility requirements proposed for the LA Justice Fund by Solis and Supervisor Janice Hahn drew fire.

In addition to the bar on prior convictions, the supervisors’ motion proposed prioritizing certain groups when doling out legal aid, including individuals with family who are U.S. citizens, heads of households, veterans and victims of crime, among others.

A coalition of organizations seeking universal representation for those threatened with deportation rallied outside the Hall of Administration and waited hours to be heard by the board.

“The devil is in the details,” said Ricardo Mireles, executive director of Academia Avance, the school where ICE agents grabbed Avelica-Gonzalez. “This is an old issue of unequal representation.”

Mireles said excluding those with prior convictions failed to reflect decades of inequities in the criminal plea bargaining system.

Immigrants often “plead up” to more serious crimes based on legal advice that the crimes are “immigration-safe” and wouldn’t alone qualify someone for deportation, according to a letter to the board from the coalition.

That letter was signed by representatives of nearly 50 civil rights organizations, faith leaders, labor unions, legal aid organizations and community alliances — including the American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California, Los Angeles County Labor Federation, Public Counsel and the
National Day Laborer Organizing Network.

The coalition called for “due process for all,” arguing for a first-come, first-served approach to providing legal aid.

Niels Frenzen, director of USC’s Gould School of Law Immigration Clinic, supported the board’s efforts to set priorities, saying there wasn’t enough funding to help everyone.

“We’re operating in a world with finite resources,” Frenzen said.

If forced to set priorities, the county should first help those at most imminent risk of deportation, sitting in federal detention, said coalition spokeswoman Emi MacLean of the National Day Laborer Organizing Network.

MacLean accused the board of “playing into the Trump framework of ‘good’ and ‘bad’ immigrants” and warned that Los Angeles County might end up on the “wrong side of history.”

She estimated that it would cost $12 million to provide legal representation to everyone inside of Adelanto Detention Center, which houses most individuals detained by federal immigration agents in Los Angeles County.

The LA Justice Fund is aiming to raise $10 million. The board has indicated its intent to contribute $1 million and more than $6 million more has been pledged by other public and private entities, including $2 million by the city of Los Angeles.

The motion by Solis and Hahn was “referred back” to Solis’ office, the county’s version of a redo.

The board also voted 4-1 Tuesday to formally establish the Immigrant Protection and Advancement Task Force, with Barger voting no.

“Creating a task force and hiding illegal immigrants from federal enforcement only institutionalizes their illegal status and forces them further into the shadows,” Barger said. “These actions are reactionary and counterproductive in the effort to help individuals seek a path to citizenship or apply for legal status to be in the United States.

“Rather than moving toward becoming a sanctuary state and county in violation of federal law, both the state and the county should be leading the effort to initiate congressional action to enact comprehensive immigration reform.”

The motion calls on each supervisor to appoint one member. Those five appointees will be charged with identifying other representatives up to a total of 11 members.

The coalition represents a very diverse set of communities and one member called for the same inclusiveness on the task force.

“Black immigrants have been severely ignored in the conversation about immigration despite the consistent rise in unjust deportation in black immigrant communities,” said Addis Daniel of the African Communities Public Health Coalition.

“We hope that a task force that is inclusive … will help to address the needs of immigrants across the board rather than just those with the most visibility.”

County Wants DTSC to Expedite Exide Cleanup

March 2, 2017 by · Leave a Comment 

County health officials said Tuesday they are pressing state regulators to expedite the cleanup of an estimated 400 homes near the shuttered Exide battery-recycling plant in Vernon that have hazardous waste-level lead contamination.

The 400 homes where soil tested for lead showed levels at or above 1,000 parts per million are the highest priority, according to Angelo Bellomo, the county’s deputy director for health protection.

“We believe there is sufficient basis for … expediting the cleanup (of soil on those properties),’’ Bellomo told the Board of Supervisors.

However, the DTSC is considering other criteria ­— in addition to contamination levels – in deciding how to prioritize cleanup of individual homes.

Those factors include whether children under the age of 7 or pregnant women live at a contaminated site and whether residents have a blood-lead level at or above five micrograms per deciliter, according to guidance published on the agency’s website.

County officials disagree.

“Everybody who is living in a house [with levels at or above 1,000 ppm]… needs mitigation … and needs mitigation immediately,” Department of Public Health Director Barbara Ferrer told the board.

“And that means soil removal and not laying plastic over it.”

Bellomo said he hoped initial cleanup efforts could begin in April.

“I sense that (the state Department of Toxic Substances Control) is trying to do the right thing, but they seem to be going very slow,” Supervisor Hilda Solis said.

DTSC documentation calls for a draft cleanup plan and environmental impact report to be finalized in June, with cleanup beginning in the summer. An agency spokeswoman confirmed those time estimates still hold, but said high-risk sites could be addressed earlier.

Properties with contamination between 400-1,000 ppm also meet federal regulatory levels for cleanup and state public health officials calculate that levels need to be below 80 ppm to eliminate lead risk.

The DTSC’s proposal calls for soil to be cleaned to below 80 ppm, and agency contractors are still in the process of testing the lead levels in surrounding communities. The regulatory agency estimates that it could handle cleanup of an average of 50 properties per week and that the work would be completed within two years.

State and county personnel are wrangling over whether cleanup is warranted inside homes, according to Bellomo, with the county arguing that interiors must at least be assessed and possibly cleaned.

Community leaders are also making this point,’’ Bellomo told the board.

The agency said in December that it would offer interior cleaning, but did not specify in what cases and whether that cleaning would be to specific environmental standards or to deal with the consequences of soil removal.

The discussion about DTSC’s progress was prompted when Solis asked for an update on complaints by workers employed to do soils testing.

Some workers employed by DTSC contractors alleged that they have been forced to manipulate testing data, work in unsafe conditions that expose them to contaminated soil and subjected to racist and derogatory comments by field managers, Deputy County Counsel Robert Ragland told the board.

The allegations have been referred to the state Attorney General’s office.

“I think the investigation has just begun,” Ragland said, telling the board that the county was awaiting the results of that review.

DTSC “encourages potentially affected individuals to have their blood lead levels tested’’ and offers a hotline for residents with questions about cleanup at (844) 225-3887.

 

County Supervisors Back Tougher Fed Rules on Payday Lenders

September 15, 2016 by · Leave a Comment 

The Board of Supervisors Tuesday voted its unanimous support of federal regulations targeting predatory lending practices by payday, car title and installment lenders.

“We believe protecting families and their pocketbooks is good public policy,” Supervisor Hilda Solis said.

The city of Los Angeles has the highest number of payday lenders in the state, with about 800 stores found mostly in communities of color, according to Solis.

“Californians now pay over $700 million in fees on these loans every year,” Solis said. “Our families are trapped in cycles of high-cost debt.”

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, created in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, has proposed rules requiring lenders to assess a borrower’s ability to repay a loan, restrict lenders from requiring access to a borrower’s checking account and cap annual percentage rates for some short-term loans at 36 percent.

Payday loans typically have a 14- or 30-day term and are payable in full upon receipt of a paycheck, tax refund or other expected cash payment.

California law limits the fee on payday loans to $15 per $100, up to a maximum of $45. That charge translates to an APR of 460 percent for a two-week loan.

The majority of payday customers are repeat customers. The CFPB found that borrowers at payday loan stores took out a median of 10 loans and more than 80 percent of loans were rolled over or renewed within two weeks.

Roughly 75 percent of fees generated come from borrowers who take out 11 or more loans each year.

California law is tougher than that in many states and prohibits lenders from writing a new loan to pay off an existing debt or making a new loan while an existing loan is outstanding.

The public may comment on the proposed rules through Oct. 7 at consumerfinance.gov.

L.A. Approves Fee on Developers for Parks

September 8, 2016 by · Leave a Comment 

Apartment developers, who typically construct the majority of residential units in Los Angeles, will join condominium builders in paying into the city’s park fund, under a set of updated requirements approved Wednesday by the City Council.

Cities are allowed to collect fees from developers under the state’s Quimby Act and use that money on nearby park projects. Los Angeles has long had a park fee policy in place, but city officials and park advocates complain that the rules, which have not been updated for more than 30 years, have fallen short on paying for the city’s green space and recreation needs.

The changes approved by the council are expected to bring in more money through the addition of apartment developments, which were generally excluded from the fees. In past years, the fees have brought in about $22 million annually, according to council aides.

The new rules will also let the city spend the funds in a wider area than previously allowed by increasing the two-mile radius for park projects to a five-mile radius of the development.

Councilman Jose Huizar, who pushed to update the park fees policy, said the more restrictive radius made it difficult to use the funds where they were needed.

“This is something that is really going to change the lives of thousands, if not millions of Angelenos,” he said of the new policy.

Huizar staffers estimate that with the added fee payments from the apartment projects, the annual park fee revenue could increase by another $30 million. City officials, however, have avoided settling on any specific, projected figure.

The rough estimate from Huizar’s office was calculated using the 10,000 apartment units that are typically permitted annually, but assuming revenue will only come from about half of them. The total number of units permitted each year, including condos and some single-family homes, has been roughly 15, 000.

The council also adopted a new fee structure today. Instead of the existing process in which developers pay fees in the range of about $2,800 to $8,000 per unit, they will now pay flat amounts.

Under the new structure, developers of condo projects will owe the city $10,000 per unit, following an initial year when the fee will be $7,500 per unit. Apartments units, which are rented out instead of sold, will cost developers $2,500 per unit in the first year, after which a $5,000-per-unit fee kicks in. Both the condo and apartment fees are set to rise along with inflation, following the second year.

Developers will have some options for avoiding paying the fees under the rules, including giving away or “dedicating” land to the city or offering to pay for improvements to existing park space and facilities, in place of paying the park fee. Developers are also exempted from the park fees for each affordable housing unit included in their projects.

The park fee update was supported by the Los Angeles Neighborhood Land Trust and other park advocacy groups, and in recent months won the support of pro-developer groups like the Central City Association.

The requirements, which still require approval from the mayor, are set to go into effect 120 days after adoption.

County Wants More Foster Children Placed with Relatives

June 2, 2016 by · Leave a Comment 

The Board of Supervisors voted Tuesday to back efforts to increase the number of foster children placed with relatives, rather than assigning them to group homes.

Supervisors Sheila Kuehl and Hilda Solis proposed that staffers come up with a plan to increase foster placements with relatives.

The move was prompted in part by Assembly Bill 403, the Continuum of Care Reform, set to take effective next January.

The law — which Kuehl and Solis called a “major shift in the way we approach child welfare” — requires that children be directed away from long-term group homes and placed in a family setting whenever possible.

“L.A. County has already proven that we know how to increase relative placements,” Kuehl said. “With the Continuum of Care Reform on the horizon and research indicating that children placed with relatives have better educational, health and behavioral outcomes, it’s a no-brainer to build on our success.”

An important element of the plan will be a method for identifying family members as soon as possible after a child is removed from an abusive or neglectful situation.

Currently, more than half of the approximately 18,000 children in out-of-home care in the county are placed in the homes of relatives, compared to 29 percent nationally and 40 percent statewide, according to the supervisors’ motion.

“While Los Angeles County exceeds the national rate for placing foster youth with relatives, there is always more work to be done to increase and support relative placements,” Solis said. “This motion provides a pathway to reduce delays in placing children with their relatives and to increase placement options.”

Last year, the board opted into a state program that offers “kinship caregivers” — family members who take in a foster child — the same financial support as other foster parents.

About half of the county’s kinship caregivers are 51-70 years old. Many live on fixed incomes, making it hard for them to cover the costs of caring for a child who may have landed on their doorstep in the middle of the night after an incident of abuse.

The county offers up to $2,000 in emergency funding for caregivers and set up a “warm line” earlier this year to lend support to foster families.

Compliance with the new law — which seeks to relegate group homes to offering short-term, intensive care services, rather than long-term placements — will also mean recruiting more foster parents overall.

The county’s Department of Children and Family Services has struggled to find enough families to care for all of its foster kids. Officials have attributed the problem to the financial pressures of raising a child and the county’s policy of working toward reunifying families.

Some parents are reluctant to foster a child who may ultimately be returned to their birth parents.

Information on fostering and adoption is available at www.shareyourheartla.org or by calling (888) 811-1121.

County Delays Decision on Possible ‘Millionaire Tax’

May 12, 2016 by · Leave a Comment 

The Board of Supervisors delayed a decision Tuesday on whether to press for a change to state law that would allow the county to put a “millionaire’s tax” on the November ballot to fund the fight against homelessness.

Supervisors Mark Ridley-Thomas and Sheila Kuehl proposed the legislative push.

“One-time commitments will not address the crisis of homelessness in Los Angeles,” Ridley-Thomas said.

County Chief Executive Officer Sachi Hamai said the county needed to raise about $500 million in ongoing revenue to effectively address the problem.

Kuehl recalled a recent trip to Washington, D.C., with other members of the board.

“Everywhere we went, in every office, homelessness was the issue that was raised again and again and again,” Kuehl said. “And the question, ‘What are you going to do’”

Hamai said a vote in favor would “give the county an option,” and the board would decide later whether to pursue a ballot measure.

In order to have a shot at that option, the county must submit a proposal for a budget trailer bill by June 15, to be approved and signed by Gov. Jerry Brown by June 30.

Despite the short deadline, Supervisors Don Knabe and Hilda Solis successfully pushed to postpone the decision.

Knabe warned about the unintended consequences of a legislative change, which he said would set a precedent for the state to refuse to fund other county needs.

In the future, state officials might tell the county, “Whatever you need, you tax your residents,” Knabe said.

Solis raised concerns about an analysis of homelessness in her district and how it would affect the allocation of revenues. She said the data was provided at the last minute and taking more time to analyze it would allow the board to make a stronger case to state legislators.

The board ultimately voted 2-2-1, with Knabe and Supervisor Michael Antonovich dissenting and Solis abstaining. The board will reconsider the matter next week.

The board has the ability to raise local sales taxes on its own, but needs the state to give it the authority to place the so-called “millionaire’s tax” on the ballot.

A half-percent increase in county sales taxes was one of several other options county staffers and pollsters considered as a means of raising money to combat homelessness. A parcel tax, redirection of Measure B revenues — designed to support trauma centers — and a marijuana tax were other possibilities.

The idea of a half-percent tax on personal income in excess of $1 million garnered the highest support from voters polled, with 76 percent in favor.

Support for a sales tax increase polled at 69 percent — within the margin of error of the two-thirds of voters needed to pass any such measure.

Antonovich expressed skepticism about polls showing broad support for the tax given all the other taxes that may be on the November ballot.

“To have people come out and say they’ll vote yes on four, five, six different taxes is not logical,” Antonovich said. “There’s a problem with the credibility of the poll.”

Pollsters said a homelessness measure would have “no negative impacts” on other measures being considered, including the proposed transportation Measure R2, a potential parcel tax to fund county parks and the possible extension of Proposition 30, a “temporary” statewide tax to fund education.

Phil Ansell, director of the county’s homeless initiative, defended the polling methodology and told the board that voters view homelessness as the second most significant issue facing the county, behind only jobs and the economy.

Ridley-Thomas said the polling reflected voters’ compassion.

“It’s related to a sense of sadness and also anger,” he said.

California millionaires are already paying a 1 percent tax on income in excess of $1 million, as mandated by Proposition 63, passed in 2004 as the Mental Health Services Act. The MHSA is estimated to generate about $1.4 billion in 2015-16 and as much as $1.8 billion by 2018-19 to fund mental health programs, including housing for mentally ill individuals.

The new tax now under consideration by the board would not be restricted to helping those who are mentally ill.

Dozens of advocates urged the board to back the so-called millionaire’s tax, arguing that without the money, the homeless population would only grow.

“We will see more people living in boxes,” said Anne Miskey, CEO of the Downtown Women’s Center.

Homelessness in Los Angeles County increased by roughly 6 percent this year to 46,874 people, according to a recent report by the Los Angeles County Homeless Services Authority.

However, the number of homeless veterans decreased by 30 percent and the number of homeless families was down by 18 percent, which Ansell cited as evidence that county efforts to house homeless veterans and families are working.

“Homelessness persists and has worsened,” Ansell said, but “dedicated resources and focused systemwide attention gets results.”

Antonovich said the problem was not the lack of a tax, but the state’s allocation of the taxes it raises, and argued that higher taxes would drive entrepreneurs and jobs out of the county.

Though it was clear that Antonovich would not support a legislative change and Knabe seemed set on a delay, Ridley-Thomas made an impassioned plea for Solis to join him in voting in favor.

“Do we have the stamina, do we have the resolve, do we have the commitment to step up to our responsibilities?” Ridley-Thomas asked, before making a direct appeal to Solis to act now.

Solis abstained after arguing that a week’s delay wouldn’t significantly hurt the process.

More millionaires — an estimated 772,555 households — live in California than any other state, according to a 2015 study of high-net worth individuals by Phoenix Marketing International. And nearly one-quarter of America’s billionaires live in the state, according to Forbes magazine.

Next Page »

Copyright © 2017 Eastern Group Publications/EGPNews, Inc. ·