I was raised in Southeast LA County, in the shadow of the 710 freeway, a community suffocated by rail yards and freeways. It is a region identified by the U.S. federal air quality standards as one of the worst in the nation. Unfortunately, Southeast cities are often left out of critical county decisions that will impact our region’s quality of life for decades to come. This is true when it comes to air quality, community health and transportation funding.
On November 8, voters will be asked to approve the Los Angeles County Traffic Improvement Plan, otherwise known as Measure M, which would enact a ½ cent sales tax increase that will generate approximately $860 million a year for transportation infrastructure improvements throughout LA County. While Measure M addresses much needed transportation challenges, we must ensure that the needs of the gateway corridor are considered, and that our residents have a seat at the decision making table.
Indeed, the transit network in the county is in poor health and has challenging and complex needs. Our dated roads and freeways weren’t made to withstand our ballooning population which now tops 10.2 million, resulting in congested commutes that average 81 hours a year for Angelenos.
Unfortunately, the planning process headed by the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) has rendered the cities in Southeast Los Angeles County largely irrelevant. For example, proposals in Measure M would delay long overdue rehabilitation projects on the 5, 605 and 710 freeways up to forty years. Alternatively, projects on the Westside and in the Valley would be placed ahead of the queue. This is unacceptable and in order to win Southeast support, county leaders must address this inequity in a meaningful way.
In a show of solidarity, Southeast leaders have successfully fought for our fair share of Measure M funding. Our cities, stretching from Vernon to Long Beach, have been steadfast and unified in our advocacy for the region.
Our collective efforts got the attention of the MTA and LA Mayor Eric Garcetti who have expressed goodwill toward working collaboratively moving forward. I take these leaders at their word and will work with members of the community to ensure projects in our region are prioritized should Measure M be approved.
MTA has committed to accelerate development of the Eco-Rapid/West Santa Ana Branch transit line, a 20-mile light rail project that provides our constituents safe, reliable transportation to Union Station in Downtown LA. In a show of good faith, MTA agreed to prioritize state and federal funding that will get southeast transportation projects shovel ready.
The mounting pressure has also pushed MTA to include several Long Beach projects such the rehabilitation of the Shoemaker Bridge, the Wardlow Station, as well as expanding resources to address public safety concerns at certain public transit stations, to be prioritized and receive vital funding from Measure M.
I commend our gateway cities for standing up for our working families and highlighting the discrepancies within current MTA funding formulas that disadvantage our neighborhoods. I encourage the MTA, Mayor Garcetti and our regional leaders to continue to work together on behalf of some of our most vulnerable residents.
With Measure M, we have an opportunity to fix and repair our aging transit infrastructure, which undoubtedly improves the quality of life and public health for the millions of residents living in 27 cities across Southeast Los Angeles County. But we must do so in a fair and inclusive manner so that all LA County residents benefit.
I support Measure M because of this unique opportunity. And like many of my residents, I do so with the understanding that our community will get its fair share. I look forward to working with the MTA, Mayor Garcetti, Southeast leaders and other decision-makers to ensure that this is the case.
Sen. Ricardo Lara (D-Bell Gardens) represents California’s 33rd Senate District.
A boring machine dubbed “Angeli” began its underground journey Wednesday to create tunnels for Metro’s regional connector project, which will link up the Blue, Expo and Gold lines in downtown Los Angeles when completed.
Metro board members, including Mayor Eric Garcetti, were on hand for a ceremonial lowering of the boring machine, which was officially named Angeli, the Latin name for angels.
Will Rogers Middle School eighth-grader Windsor McInerny came up with the winning submission in a naming contest.
“Building out a 21st century transportation system means creating links so that people can get around L.A. County with ease,” Garcetti said. “As ‘Angeli’ digs through the heart of Downtown, she is creating seamless connections for Angelenos from Azusa to Santa Monica.”
Garcetti added that Angelenos will benefit from even more connections soon after another boring machine named “Harriet Tubman” completes digging work on the Crenshaw/LAX line, which will connect stations in Crenshaw and Inglewood to the Green and Expo lines.
The $1.55 million regional connector project is scheduled to be completed in 2021, with Metro officials estimating it could shave off 20 minutes in traveling time for passengers.
The full length of the line including above-ground portions will run a total of 1.9 miles, and include three new stations.
Metro board Chair John Fasana, who is a Duarte city councilman, called the start of tunneling “a major milestone toward the completion of a vital project that truly connects the region by providing a one-seat ride to downtown Los Angeles for users of the Blue, Gold and Expo lines.
“The Regional Connector will reduce travel times for many Metro rail riders and make our system much more convenient and attractive to those who want a transit alternative to driving,” he said.
Hoping to garner support for a November ballot transit measure, Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti made a trip to Commerce City Hall Tuesday to ask the city council to drop its opposition to Measure M, which if approved by voters will authorize a permanent one-cent increase in the sales tax to fund transportation project.
“I’m here to ask for your support,” Garcetti told the council in what turned out to be a one-way dialogue with Garcetti doing all the talking.
Commerce is among a group of East and Southeast area cities opposed to the passage of Measures M on grounds that their constituents will be paying in to the fund for decades before any of their transportation woes are addressed.
The tax hike would generate at least $860 million annually for highway and street repairs, new rail and bus lines and transportation improvements.
Proponents of the transit tax claim it will help solve the region’s traffic congestion problems, improve air quality and create jobs.
Cities opposing the tax hike are unhappy that improvements to transit projects in their region, such as the 1-5 and 710 freeways, will be delayed under Measure M. They claim the distribution of projects favor the western and northern parts of the County.
Garcetti pointed out projects in some parts of Los Angeles will also not see funding for 30 years.
Surprisingly, council members did not use the opportunity to reiterate their opposition to the Measure, or to get the visiting mayor and Metro chair to agree to work with the city on transportation issues in the future.
In August, the 23 cities that makeup the Gateway Cities Council of Government, including Commerce, spearheaded an educational outreach campaign to specifically inform voters what Measure M’s impacts would or would not have. That same month, Commerce and a handful of cities unsuccessfully filed a lawsuit claiming Measure M was misleading when it failed to state the proposed tax would be permanent.
“We’re friends no matter what, before or after,” Garcetti assured Commerce council members.
“I urge you to support Measure M, if not, can you stay neutral?”
Garcetti acknowledged that the city of Commerce, home to 13,000 residents but a daytime working population of 80,000, did have a good argument when they questioned what the return would be to their city.
“But if nothing passes it will be more than 30 years” before transportation issues in the region are addressed, Garcetti told EGP following his presentation.
Currently, Commerce generates about $8 million a year in Measure R sales tax revenue for the county, but annually only gets back about $150,000. The city’s contribution would double to $16 million under Measure M, but it would only receive around $300,000 a year based on its population.
Commerce previously supported Measure R, a temporary half-cent tax that will sunset in 2039 unless it is made permanent under Measure M, which adds an additional half-cent to the sales tax. A two-third margin is required for Measure M to pass. In 2012, a similar ballot measure failed to pass by less than 1 percent.
“We all know it takes a few to defeat this, why not come together to solve our traffic woes,” Garcetti told council members, who did not respond to his statement, instead voting to just receive and file his presentation without action.
College students in the Los Angeles area can now apply for cheaper Metro fares when they register for full- or part-time class loads, transportation officials said Monday.
Under a two-year pilot program launched by Metro this year, college students will be able to add a reduced fare sticker to their student identification cards that they can use in place of TAP boarding passes.
The U-Pass, or Universal College Student Fare pass, was approved by the Metro board in May, and is now available to students who are taking at least eight credits worth of classes.
Student passes previously had only been available to full-time students and were typically not part of the class registration process.
“The reforms Metro has made to this program this year benefit both the agency and students,” Metro board Chair John Fasana said. “As students strive for a higher education, they now can have access to efficient and affordable public transportation while giving Metro a great opportunity to increase ridership and encourage the use of public transit.”
Metro board officials promoted the program today by issuing the 1,500th U-Pass to a Cal State Northridge student.
The program is available to students taking classes within the Los Angeles Community College District, California State University and University of California (UC) systems, as well as at private universities and vocational colleges.
Participating colleges include Rio Hondo College, Los Angeles Trade Tech College, the California Institute of Technology and Pasadena City College.
A judge Tuesday rejected a petition filed on behalf of Commerce and 7 other cities seeking significant changes in the ballot language for the Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s proposed half-cent county sales tax measure, saying there was no evidence the wording was confusing to voters.
Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Mary H. Strobel said Measure M is not an initiative and therefore did not require the ballot language specifics sought in the action filed last week by the cities of Carson, Commerce, Norwalk, Torrance, Santa Fe Springs, Ranchos Palos Verdes and Signal Hill.
The petition alleged that the ballot label for Measure M did not include the actual 1 percent total rate of the tax to be imposed. The petitioners also claimed the ballot label for Measure M does not state that the proposed tax would be permanent.
Carson Mayor Albert Robles said after the hearing that he and the other coalition members were disappointed with the ruling and are considering an appeal. He said Metro’s argument that the coalition was required to seek help from the Legislature was not an option because it would have been too late to do so in time for the November election.
“All we are seeking is transparency,” Robles said, adding, “The voters shouldn’t be misled and confused.”
Signal Hill City Councilman Larry Forester said many residents of the southern part of Los Angeles County do not have access to computers in order to read background material on Measure M.
“It’s a sad day for voters,” Forester said.
The petitioners said the ballot measure leads voters to believe that there will be an equal distribution of projects. In reality, projects in the western and northern of the regions of the county will take priority, while southern Los Angeles County regions will not see any benefits until 2039-2040, according to the petitioners.
“The plaintiffs attempted to mislead the voters with a politically motivated lawsuit, but the court ruled today that there was no evidence the wording is confusing to voters,” said Yusef Robb of the campaign on behalf of Measure M in response to the judge’s decision.
“Measure M is clear on what it will do: ease congestion and make transportation improvements Countywide and in each of L.A. County’s 88 cities … The plaintiffs should stop interfering with the voters’ right to make their own judgment on Measure M.” Robb said in written statement.
Attorneys for a coalition of seven Los Angeles County cities will try again Tuesday to file a request for an accelerated hearing on a lawsuit filed last week on behalf of taxpayers concerning the
ballot language for Measure M, the Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s proposed half-cent county sales tax ballot action.
The Los Angeles Superior Court petition filed by the cities of Carson, Commerce, Norwalk, Torrance, Santa Fe Springs, Ranchos Palos Verdes and Signal Hill alleges that the ballot label for Measure M is misleading and does not include the actual 1 percent total rate of the tax to be imposed. Lawyers for the petitioners arrived too late to Judge Mary H. Strobel’s courtroom today for a hearing.
The petitioners also say that the ballot label for Measure M does not state that the proposed tax is permanent.
Measure M opponents say that the ballot measure leads voters to believe that there will be an equal distribution of projects, according to the petitioning cities. In reality, projects in the western and northern of the regions of the county will take priority, while southern Los Angeles County
regions will not see any benefits until 2039-2040, the petitioners say.
The group is asking a judge in a suit filed Friday to correct what they maintain are numerous inaccuracies, misstatements and misrepresentations by amending the ballot label so that voters can cast an informed vote.
“The public deserves, and the law requires, a transparent, accurate description of tax Measure M, including spending priorities,” said G. Ross Trindle, the lead attorney for the petitioning cities.
“At a minimum, state law requires the ballot label to disclose how much money Measure M will cost taxpayers every year and it does not do that. The public will not receive this essential information from the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s current title and description of Measure M, which is critical for taxpayers to cast an informed vote.”
Measure M “does not meet the simple test of fairness and equity,” said Carson Mayor Albert Robles. “But you wouldn’t know that from its current description. If Measure M passes, taxpayers in about 50 communities, representing at least 2 million residents, will be paying for Measure M
forever, but won’t see any traffic relief on their freeways and roads for decades down the line.”
The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors went on record Tuesday against a state bill that would cut the number of county seats on the Metropolitan Transportation Authority Board of Directors from five to two.
Senate Bill 1379, sponsored by Sen. Tony Mendoza, D-Artesia, would maintain 14 board seats, but replace three of the county seats with a post for Long Beach and for appointees of the president pro tempore of the Senate and the speaker of the Assembly.
Supervisor Hilda Solis recommended sending a letter to Gov. Jerry Brown and legislative leaders opposing the bill and directing county lobbyists to actively advocate against it.
In her motion, Solis said each of the supervisors acts on behalf of the incorporated cities that comprise their district when they vote on the Metro board, not just the unincorporated areas of the county.
In addition to the five county seats, the current board includes Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti and three of his appointees, four members appointed from other cities and one non-voting member appointed by the governor.
The debate comes as officials wrangle over Metro’s plans for spending the estimated $120 billion that would be generated by a half-cent sales tax increase proposed by Measure M. The measure is set for the Nov. 8 ballot and requires the approval of at least two-thirds of voters to pass.
Also known as the Los Angeles County Traffic Improvement Plan, the measure includes a package of new rail and bus lines, highway improvements, bike lanes and street repairs.
Mendoza said the plan does not consider the needs of communities countywide and questioned the Metro board’s process for choosing and prioritizing specific projects.
He originally proposed adding 10 seats to the Metro board to address what he sees as a “lopsided system.”
Supervisor Michael Antonovich said if Mendoza “was interested in having a real regional body,” he should reallocate seats held by the city of Los Angeles to other municipalities.
Before the vote, Antonovich amended Solis’s motion to also oppose any measure that would reduce the county’s representation on the board or expand the city of Los Angeles’ representation.
Located along the state’s worst traffic bottleneck, the city of Commerce has for decades had to deal with more than its fair share of traffic, yet it’s unlikely that a proposed half-cent sales tax hike going before voters in November will help alleviate the area’s transportation woes anytime soon.
Home to hundreds of distribution and manufacturing businesses and located along a major rail yard and network of freeways, Commerce City Administrator Jorge Rifa points out that the city is one of the country’s busiest “ports.”
“We get a significant amount of traffic based on the role Commerce plays in the regional distribution of goods,” but he said the “dry port” receives no special state or federal funding to support its role in the goods movement.
“This is a regional place of investment and employment,” but “the southeast won’t see the benefits of this new tax for the first 15 years,” Rifa told EGP.
In November, voters will decide whether to approve an added half-cent sales tax that could generate at least $860 million annually for highway and street repairs, transportation improvements, and new rails and bus lines in Los Angeles County. If approved by the two-third margin required to raise taxes, the half-cent bump would start in 2017, permanently increasing the Measure R temporary half-cent sales tax hike to a full cent.
Measure R was approved by voters in 2008 as a temporary increase and is currently set to sunset in 2039.
Metro officials tout Measure M as a solution to the region’s traffic congestion problems that will also improve air quality and create jobs.
Rifa counters that in Commerce the claim should be accompanied by “fine print that says ‘20 years from now.’”
Like Measure R, Measure M would earmark funds generated for specific transportation projects outlined in an expenditure plan. The proposal has angered communities along the County’s southeast corridor that accuse Metro’s Board of pushing Measure R approved projects to the back burner under Measure M’s new expenditure plan.
Unhappy that improvements to the I-5 and 710 freeways and other regional transportation plans would be delayed under Measure M, the 23 cities that make up the Gateway Cities Council of Government are now spearheading an educational outreach campaign to specifically inform voters what Measure M’s impact would or would not have in the region.
In Commerce, the impact goes beyond the obvious traffic and environmental concerns and deals directly with the region’s goods movement, says Eddie Tafoya, executive director of the Commerce Industrial Council – Chamber of Commerce.
“We get a significant amount of traffic based on the role Commerce plays in the regional distribution of goods,” he explains. “If it’s not Vernon, it’s Commerce,” he told EGP.
Metro’s Chief Communication Officer Pauletta Tonilas told EGP it’s important to note that the agency has been working on its expenditure plan for years.
“We understand that not everyone is thrilled but this plan reflected what we heard from stakeholders,” she said. “We believe it is balanced and equitable.”
Currently, Commerce generates about $8 million a year in Measure R sales tax revenue for the county, but annually only gets back about $150,000. The city’s contribution would double to $16 million under Measure M, but it would only receive around $300,000 a year based on its population.
Tafoya is quick to point out however that while the industrial city only has 13,000 residents, its daytime population swells to nearly 80,000 people when you take into account the number of workers who flock to the city.
An additional 230,000 jobs are located in communities bordering the I-5 Freeway, including Downey, La Mirada, Montebello, Norwalk, Pico Rivera, Santa Fe Springs, Vernon in addition to Commerce.
“These jobs are all predicated on the use of freeways and yet [Metro] won’t be touching the I-5 for another 20 years,” complains Rifa.
Tonilas pointed out that not all major projects could be funded at once.
“Everything can’t happen in the first 10 years,” she told EGP. “The time sequence was based on when funds would be available.”
The Industrial Council surveyed businesses in the city and according to Tafoya, over 40 percent responded that traffic congestion is the leading reason they would consider moving out of L.A. County.
There’s no escaping that the high volume of goods traveling through the region leads to more truck traffic and congestion, said Tafoya, noting that “the I-5 is a parking lot.”
“This has a detrimental impact to the economy and quality of life,” he points out.
Tonilas says private-public partnerships would allow businesses to help fund and accelerate some projects.
Last week, the Commerce City Council approved $20,000 to support Gateway Cities’ public outreach efforts in the southeast region. Half of the money will be used to fund a local informational campaign.
“We think, as a region and community, [the plan is] short of being balanced,” Rifa told EGP. “The corridor has been shortchanged.”
Mayor Ivan Altamirano, who pushed for more funding for outreach, agrees. “I really think that’s very little to what we can potentially lose here,” he told EGP.
Before the vote, Councilman Hugo Argumedo noted that efforts to inform voters about what’s at stake locally would be an uphill battle.
“I’m sorry to say this guys, we can say $100,000, but guess what, we’re going to be outgunned,” he told the council, explaining the importance of mobilizing efforts in areas where there are the most votes.
Because city funds are being used, the materials distributed must walk a fine line of educating and not campaign against the measure.
The city, however, is no stranger to voicing its views on transportation projects and their local impacts.
Commerce has been front and center in talks about the Metro Gold Line Eastside Extension Phase 2 project. The city was successful in convincing Metro to consider a route that would include a light rail stop within its borders.
Rifa told EGP the transit measure has been and will continue to be a regular fixture on the city’s agenda as city officials are frustrated with the totality of the plan connected to the new tax.
“The southeast was a huge supporter of Measure R, now we are being ignored,” he said. “The balance has been lost and we must protect our jobs.”
Localizada a lo largo del peor embotellamiento de tráfico del estado, la Ciudad de Commerce sufre con un sinnúmero de problemas de transportación, los cuales es poco probable mejoren a resultado de un propuesto incremento de medio centavo en impuestos.
El próximo noviembre, residentes de la ciudad tendrán la oportunidad de decidir si aprueban o rechazan la Medida M, la cual muchos dicen ayudará.
Commerce, descrita como un “puerto seco” y hogar de cientos de negocios de distribución, por el administrador de la ciudad, Jorge Rifa, también se ubica cerca de un ferrocarril principal y red de autopistas.
“Recibimos una cantidad significativa de tráfico gracias a la función que Commerce juega en la distribución regional”, y agregó que el puerto no recibe ningún financiamiento especial estatal o federal para apoyar su labor.
“Éste es un lugar regional de inversión y empleo” sin embargo continuó Rifa, “el sureste no logrará ver los beneficios del nuevo impuesto durante los primeros 15 años [después de aprobarse]”, dijo a EGP.
Si los votantes llegaran a aprobar la medida, se calcula que el impuesto generaría por lo menos $860 millones anuales que se alocaran para el uso de reparaciones de las calles y autopistas, mejoramientos en transportación, y nuevos rieles y líneas de autobuses en el Condado de Los Ángeles. El incremento comenzaría a principios del 2017, y permanentemente alzaría los términos actuales de la Medida R, de medio centavo a uno completo.
La Medida R fue aprobada por los votantes en 2008 como un incremento temporal el cual finalizaría en el año 2039.
Oficiales del Metro catalogan a la Medida en cuestión como una solución a los problemas de congestión de tráfico y dicen que por ende también mejoraría la calidad del aire ambiente y generaría trabajos.
A su contrario, Rifa dice que esas afirmaciones deberían de ser acompañadas con “una cláusula en letra minuta que explique que eso no sucederá de aquí hasta 20 años”.
Similarmente a la Medida R, la M destinaría fondos, generados específicamente para proyectos de transportación, delineados en un plan de inversión.
La propuesta ha enfurecido a las comunidades a lo largo del corredor sureste de la ciudad quienes acusan al concejo del Metro de retrasar a los proyectos aprobados bajo la Medida R con el nuevo plan.
A causa del descontento por la demora de proyectos que mejorarían a las autopistas I-5 y 710 bajo la Medida M, las 23 ciudades que componen al Consejo de Ciudades Gateway ahora encabezan una campaña educativa. Estos esfuerzos son con el fin de educar a los votantes acerca de el impacto que la Medida M tendrá en la región si es aprobada.
El impacto en Commerce va más aya de las preocupaciones obvias del tráfico y trata directamente con el movimiento de bienes en la región, dijo Eddie Tafoya, director ejecutivo del Consejo Industrial de Commerce de la Cámara de Comercio.
“Recibimos una cantidad significante de tráfico a causa del papel que la ciudad juega en el movimiento de bienes”, explicó Tafoya. “Sino es Vernon es Commerce”, dijo a EGP.
Pauletta Tonilas, jefa oficial de comunicaciones del Metro le dijo a EGP que es importante tomar nota de que la agencia ha estado lidiando con sus gastos públicos por años.
“Entendemos que no todos están entusiasmados pero éste plan refleja las aportaciones de nuestros asociados”, dijo Tonilas. “Creemos que ofrece una balance y es justo”.
Actualmente, Commerce genera unos estimados $8 millones al año generados por los impuestos sobre ventas de la Medida R. En cambio, el condado solamente recibe $150,000 de regreso al año.
Tafoya rápidamente señaló que mientras la ciudad industrial solo tiene 13,000 residentes, su populación durante el día crece a unos aproximados 80,000 tomando en cuenta a la multitud de trabajadores quienes llegan a la ciudad.
Unos 230,000 trabajos adicionales están localizados en las ciudades a la orilla de la Autopista I-5, como lo son Downey, La Mirada, Montebello, Norwalk, Pico Rivera, Santa Fe Springs, y Vernon.
“Estos trabajos se basan en el uso de la Autopista I-5 y aun así [Metro] no tocará la autopista de aquí hasta 20 años” se quejó Rifa.
Tonilas señaló que no todos los proyectos mayores podrán ser financiados a la misma vez.
“No se puede arreglar todo en los primeros 10 años”, le dijo a EGP. “La secuencia fue basada en cuando los fondos serían disponibles”, dijo Tonilas.
El Consejo Industrial encuestó a negocios locales y de acuerdo a Tafoya, más del 40 por ciento respondieron que la congestión del tráfico es la razón principal por la que considerarían mudarse fuera del Condado de Los Ángeles.
No hay forma en cómo negar que el alto volumen de bienes que son trasportados por toda la región causa un incremento en tráfico de camiones y una congestión por consiguiente, dijo Tafoya, llamando a la Autopista I-5 un estacionamiento.
“Esto tiene un efecto nocivo en la economía y en la calidad de vida”, señaló.
Tonilas dijo que una asociación entre el sector público y el privado ayudaría a los negocios ha acelerar algunos de los proyectos.
La semana pasada, el Consejo de la Ciudad de Commerce aprobó el uso de $20,000 para financiar los esfuerzos públicos del Consejo de las Ciudades Gateway en la región sureste. La mitad del dinero fue alocado al uso de la campaña informativa.
“Como comunidad y región, creemos que [el plan] queda corto de ser balanceado”, dijo Rifa a EGP. “El corredor ha sido estafado”.
El alcalde Ivan Altamirano, quien empujó para recibir más fondos para la campaña está de acuerdo. “De verdad pienso que eso queda corto a lo que potencialmente podemos perder”, le dijo a EGP.
Antes del voto, el concejal Hugo Argumedo hizo mención de los esfuerzos para informar a los votantes acerca de lo que está en riesgo y que será una ardua batalla.
“Lamento decirlo, pero, podemos decir que serán $100,000 pero ¿qué creen?, vamos a ser aplastados,” le dijo al consejo explicando la importancia de movilizar los esfuerzos en áreas dónde se encuentran la mayoría de votos.
Ya que los fondos siendo usados son de la ciudad, se tendrá que mantener precaución en mantener los esfuerzos específicamente educativos y no usarlos para luchar en contra de la medida.
No obstante, la ciudad no permanece alejada de expresar su opinión acerca de proyectos de transportación y de sus impactos locales.
Commerce ha ocupado posiciones centrales en discusiones acerca de la segunda fase de expansión de la Línea Dorada del Metro en el lado este. La ciudad también logró convencer a Metro a considerar una ruta que incluyera una parada de tren ligero dentro de sus fronteras.
Rifa le dijo a EGP que la medida de transito ha sido y continuará siendo un acto permanente en la agenda de la ciudad ya que sus oficiales están totalmente frustrados con el plan del nuevo impuesto.
“El área del sureste fue un gran partidario de la Medida R, pero ahora nos están ignorando”, dijo. “El balance se ha perdido y necesitamos proteger a nuestros trabajos”.
The 2016 Olympic Games may be opening in Rio tomorrow, but there will be some Gold Medal action taking place here, close to home, over the next two weeks.
Metro and the LA2024 Olympic committee will celebrate Los Angeles’ Olympic history and past Olympic gold medalists at a series of events to be held at local transit stations starting Friday.
“Medalists will meet and greet, display their gold medals, pose for photographs and give autographs,” Metro announced.
The local champions, including multi gold and silver medal winners going back to the 1950s and more recent winners from the 2012 Olympic Games in London, will be decked out in Team USA apparel and ready to pose for selfies and distribute autographs, according to the event sponsors.
All of the events will take place during the high volume 4:30 to 6:00 p.m. transportation time.
The first stop along the Metro/LA204 Gold Medal tour will take place Friday at the El Monte Bus Station, where riders will meet Paul Gonzalez, Gold Medalist Boxing Light Flyweight and winner of the Val Barker Trophy for the top pound-for-pound boxer at the 1984 Los Angeles Games.
Aug. 8–Shirley Babshoff, 3-time Swimming Gold Medalist at the 1972 Munich Games and 1976 Montreal Games will be in downtown L.A. at Union Station.
Aug. 9 and 10 –John Naber, winner of 4 gold medals an one silver at the 1976 Montreal Games will greet riders Gold Line Sierra Madre Station (Aug. 9) and at the Culver City Expo Line Station (Aug. 10).
Aug. 11–At the Metro Red Line North Hollywood Station commuters will have a chance to meet Julianne McNamara, Gold Medal Uneven Parallel Bars 1984 Los Angeles Games, where she scored of perfect 10.0.
Aug. 12–Local favorite from the City of Commerce, Brenda Villa, will greet Gold Line Riders at the Atlantic Station on Pomona Boulevard.
Villa, who trained at the Commerce Aquatorium, was on the USA’s 2012 Water Polo team, winning a Gold Medal, two silver and one Bronze medals at the London games.
Aug. 15–Named the “World’s Greatest Athlete,” Rafer Johnson —winner of the Decathlon Gold Medal at the 1960 Games in Rome, and a Silver Medal at the 1956 Melbourne Games —will make his appearance at the Orange Line Chatsworth Station.
Aug. 16 –Meet Valerie Brisco, winner of 3 Gold Medals for the 200 meters, 400 meters, 4×400 meters relay at the 1984 Los Angeles games and a Silver Medal in the 4×400 meters dash at the 1988 Seoul games downtown at the 7th Street/Metro Center on Figueroa Street.
Aug. 17– Head over to the Metro Blue Line Downtown Long Beach Station and take a picture with Lisa Fernandez, 3-time Gold Medal winner Softball, 1996 Atlanta Games, 2000 Sydney Games and 2004 Athens Games.
Aug. 18– The Gold Medal tour lands at the Gold Line APU/Citrus College Station in Azusa, for a meet and greet with Bryan Clay, the Gold Medal Decathlon winner at the 2008 Beijing Games, named “World’s Greatest Athlete”; and the Silver Medal Decathlon winner at the 2004 Athens Games.
Aug. 19–Closing out the tour is Mark Spitz, who won a combined 9 Gold Medals in swimming at the 1968 Fames in Mexico and 1972 Games in Munich. Spitz won 7 of the Gold Medals in Munich, all in record time—a record that held for 36 years. He will make his appearance at the new Downtown Santa Monica Station of the Metro Expo Line on Colorado Avenue.